Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 486 (0.98 seconds)

New Delhi District vs . on 10 March, 2015

Malviya Nagar U/s 3,4,5 TADA Act, 5 Explosive Substances Act & 27 Arms Act In re : STATE Vs. ABDUL KARIM @ TUNDA @ ABDUL ... Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (hereinafter referred to as TADA) Act . The FIR was registered, accordingly. 3. On further search, six chhuries
Delhi District Court Cites 58 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Chirag Shokken on 23 September, 2025

section 19 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 ("TADA in short) against the judgment and order dated ... Suleman and Sadhu Ram were also convicted under Section 5 of the TADA Act. We are, however, not concerned with their caves since the appeals
Delhi District Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs 1. Gopal Goyal Kanda on 10 May, 2013

counsel for accused is not applicable as it deals with Section 15 TADA. There is difference between Section 15 TADA and Section 30 of Indian ... counsel for accused is not applicable as it deals with Section 15 TADA. There is difference between Section 15 TADA and Section 30 of Indian
Delhi District Court Cites 86 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs 1. Gopal Goyal Kanda on 10 May, 2013

counsel for accused is not applicable as it deals with Section 15 TADA. There is difference between Section 15 TADA and Section 30 of Indian ... counsel for accused is not applicable as it deals with Section 15 TADA. There is difference between Section 15 TADA and Section 30 of Indian
Delhi District Court Cites 86 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next