Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 32 (0.59 seconds)

M/S. Ushdev Trade Limited vs Sebi on 14 September, 2010

Securities and Exchange Board of India (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1997 (hereinafter called the takeover code). As the appellant had not come ... Board found that the former had violated the provisions of the takeover code. The Board also found from the annual report of the target company
Securities Appellate Tribunal Cites 9 - Cited by 2 - Full Document

M/S. Bhushan Energy Ltd. & Others vs Sebi on 28 December, 2010

Securities and Exchange Board of India (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1996 (referred hereinafter as the takeover code) is the question that arises ... voting rights in the target company and Regulation 10 of the takeover code would get triggered. Regulation 10 provides that no acquirer shall acquire shares
Securities Appellate Tribunal Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mr. Ranjan Verghese vs Sebi on 8 April, 2010

Securities and Exchange Board of India (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1997 (hereinafter called the Takeover Code). It has been found that ... make the public announcement as required by Regulation 11(1) of the Takeover Code. 2. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties
Securities Appellate Tribunal Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S. Punrasar Holding Pvt. Ltd. ... vs Sebi on 6 May, 2010

Securities and Exchange Board of India (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1997 (referred to hereinafter as the takeover code) is the short question ... delivery contract basis. This acquisition triggered Regulations 10 and 12 of the takeover code and, therefore, the appellants made a public announcement on April
Securities Appellate Tribunal Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Websity Infosys Ltd. vs Sebi on 7 January, 2010

Securities and Exchange Board of India (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1997 (for short the takeover code) and for these violations the appellants ... cent to 70.20 per cent as a result whereof the takeover code got triggered. Since the total shareholding of the promoter group had increased
Securities Appellate Tribunal Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next