outset, we must begin by referring
to the decision in Tapas D. Neogy (supra), a case arising from
three First Information Reports under Sections ... immovable property.
8. Decision of this Court in Tapas D. Neogy (supra) was in respect
of the bank accounts and it did not examine
order."
26. In the case of State of Maharashtra v. Tapas D Neogy , (1999)
7 SCC 685, it was held that the bank account ... respondents i.e. R.Chandrasekar's
case ( supra), and Tapas D.Neogy 's case (supra) and after
relying upon the judgment
seal the premises. Reliance was
8
placed on the case of Tapas D. Neogi vs. State of Maharashtra ... sealed in connection with a
criminal case. In the case of Tapas D Neogi (supra) the Hon'ble Apex Court,
inter alia, held
commission of
any offence.
4. In State of Maharashtra v. Tapas D. Neogy : [(1999) AIR
SCW 3389], it is held:
"12. Having considered ... powers under Section 102
Cr.P.C. and the judgment in Tapas D. Neogy (supra).
6. Consequently, petition fails and is dismissed. No costs.
(Sanjay
considered and
answered in the case of State of Maharashtra V. Tapas D. Neogy .
The Court examined the question whether the police officer
investigating
Supreme
Court in the case of State of Maharashtra Vs. Tapas D. Neogy ,
as reported in (1999) 7 Supreme Court Cases 685. However,
according
down by the Supreme Court in
the State of Maharashtra v. Tapas D. Neogy [(1999) 7 SCC
685] to immovable properties in order to bring
case of State of
Maharashtra Vs. Tapas D.Neogy and another Judgment of this Court
reported in 2003 Crl.L.J 2779 in the case
decision rendered in the case of State of Maharashtra
v. Tapas D. Neogy (supra) is of little assistance to the
respondents as it was rendered
Supreme Court in the case of State of
Maharashtra Vs. Tapas D. Neogy, (1997) 7 SCC 685 and in particular
paragraphs
