2001 Page 6 of 12
Coupled with the tape-recorded conversation between the Complainant and
the Appellant, there is sufficient evidence to bring home ... testimonies of PW1 and PW6 with regard to the placement of tape-recorder or
that the bribe money was recovered from the hand or from
cross-examination of the prosecutrix on 25th February, 2008
produced tape-recorded conversation of the prosecutrix wherein she had
conceded her love affair with ... taped voice is crucial and indeed such proper
identification of the voices is the sine qua non for the use of the said tape-
recorded
phone call and repeated the offer which
conversation was duly tape-recorded and he again sought help to link the
properties in the name ... Sharma to be owned by the Appellant. The
said tape-recorded conversation has neither been proved to be in the voice of
the Appellant
unrealistic to expect a witness to be a
human tape-recorder.
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed
By:PREETI
Crl.A. Nos.585/2019 ... down by Hon'ble Supreme Court as
regards admissibility of tape recorded conversation. Hon'ble Supreme
Court in the case of Ram Singh
conviction cannot be based on his sole
testimony. Further the tape recorded conversation is inadmissible in
evidence being violative of the law laid down ... Singh (supra) Supreme Court was dealing with the tape
recorded conversation. In the present case the dispute qua the recorded
cassettes is only that they
Appellant contends that the learned Trial
Court erroneously relied upon the tape recorded conversation to corroborate
the version of the Complainant in the absence ... that the learned Trial Court
could not have relied upon the tape recorded conversation. It is admitted
position that voice sample of the Appellant
voice samples of the Appellant were not taken and the
alleged tape-recorded version was never sent to the CFSL. All the three
independent witnesses ... admitted that in view of the fact that the tape-recorded
conversation was neither sealed nor the voice sample was identified by a
person acquainted
prepared was not proved to be of the Appellant. The
alleged tape recorded conversation was sealed on 27th June, 1994 however,
the same was unauthorisedly ... Appellant on Telephone No. 7132914 from the CBI office
which was tape recorded in a cassette Ex. P1 in the presence of the witnesses
after
shadow witness the
Appellant would not accept the money. A tape recorder was arranged with a
blank cassette. The raiding party reached the office ... were compared and
the same tallied. The Complainant handed over the tape recorder to the CBI
officer which was played wherein voices had been recorded
taken and sent to CFSL to match the voices in the tape-recorded
conversation. The call details of the mobile phone of Dilshad ... took over the
investigation made no efforts to collect the tape-recorded CDs of the ransom
calls. Though SI Harbir Singh later collected the said
