Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 39 (0.97 seconds)

Cbi vs . 1 Prit Pal Singh, on 31 May, 2012

nothing to indicate any sort of conspiracy between accused. (d) Tape-recorded conversation cannot be looked into as DVR on which conversation was allegedly recorded ... place at GS Mall, was recorded by complainant on such DVR and the recording, as appearing in Digital Voice Recorder, was transferred to audio cassette
Delhi District Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State (Cbi) vs ) Somesh Kumar Mittal on 5 November, 2012

service providers. The expert report about the voices in the tape recorded conversation and about the chemical wash conducted at the spot were received from ... continuity of recording nor that I have found anything to suggest that any editing of the recording was done. Fourthly, the entire tape recorded conversation
Delhi District Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Cbi vs 1. R. K. Tiwari on 13 March, 2012

defence counsel further argued that the questioned voices and tape recorded conversations were identified during trial only by PW2. It was submitted that identification ... held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court that... "A tape recorded statement is admissible in evidence subject to the following conditions
Delhi District Court Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next