Court On Its Own Motion vs State And Others on 21 August, 2008
Court On Its Own Motion vs State And Others on 21 August, 2008
Author: Madan
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 1244 (1.82 seconds)Savita Alias Babbal vs State Of Delhi on 28 April, 2011
prosecution relied on post event
developments and facts, such as alleged tape recorded conversation between the swami and
others. It was argued that the evidence ... submitted next, that the prosecution failed to prove the tape recordings, which
led to the alleged seizures, and that such recordings were indeed that
S.K. Saini & Anr vs C.B.I. on 19 August, 2015
complainant with
direction to give the same on specific demand. A tape recorder was
given to the complainant to record the conversation on arrival ... manner. First of all it is to be seen whether the tape recorded
conversation between the two i.e. accused No.1 and the complainant
State vs Ravi @ Munna on 11 October, 1999
said telephone was being received on the said telephone was being tape recorded. The voice on the telephone was indentified by Rajender Kumar as being ... From this, the learned counsel wants us to infer that the tape recording took place prior to 7th December, 1989.
22. PW-10, Ram Narain
Nepal Singh Rawal vs Cbi on 4 July, 2011
acceptance of the appellant.
(iii) No forensic examination of the audio tapes,
recorded by the CBI.
(iv) No voice match of the appellant ... Place, New Delhi, were procured and in their
presence a tally tape recorder was fitted to telephone
installed in the office
Deepti Kapur vs Kunal Julka on 30 June, 2020
Judge Bench of the Supreme Court has held that a
tape recording can be considered as a statement, provided it
is not tampered with ... that the tape recording was done
without knowledge is not in itself an objection to its
admissibility.
2
MANU/AP/0907/2007
Bhupender Singh vs The State (Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi) on 6 April, 2011
also lifted chance prints marked as Q1 and Q2
from a tape recorder RX-FS 400 lying in the lobby of the complainant‟s
house ... memo Ex PW3/B. The
police had also seized the tape recorder, one steel chain (the two ends of
which were closed with
Drojan Singh vs The State (Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi) on 6 April, 2011
also lifted chance prints marked as Q1 and Q2
from a tape recorder RX-FS 400 lying in the lobby of the complainant‟s
house ... memo Ex PW3/B. The
police had also seized the tape recorder, one steel chain (the two ends of
which were closed with
Anil Kumar Tito @ Anil Kumar Sharma @ ... vs State Nct Of Delhi on 29 May, 2015
admitted by PW19. Further the case of the complainant is that
tape recording was done on Tata Indicom phone. The appellant produced
two witnesses ... record or by others who know it.
(b) Accuracy of what was actually recorded had to be proved by
the maker of the record
Roop Chand vs State(Cbi) on 7 January, 2011
2001 Page 6 of 12
Coupled with the tape-recorded conversation between the Complainant and
the Appellant, there is sufficient evidence to bring home ... testimonies of PW1 and PW6 with regard to the placement of tape-recorder or
that the bribe money was recovered from the hand or from