Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 561 (0.99 seconds)

Ritesh Sinha vs State Of U.P.& Anr on 7 December, 2012

Code was rejected. Counsel submitted that the question of admissibility of tape recorded conversation is relevant for the present controversy. In this connection, he relied ... investigating agency to deal with the modern crimes where tape recorded conversations are often very crucial. 8. Though, Mr. Dave, learned counsel for the appellant
Supreme Court of India Cites 57 - Cited by 122 - Full Document

Sukhram Pal vs State on 9 January, 2012

accepting the evidence of PW-2 with regard to the tape recording of the demands made through mobile phone calls. The tape recordings were ... Trial Court, urged counsel, assumed that the document - i.e., the tape recordings were admissible, and proceeded to act on them, without ensuring that
Delhi High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - S R Bhat - Full Document

Venus Records & Tapes P. Ltd ( Now Known As ... vs Assessee on 6 December, 2012

Venus Records & Tapes P. Ltd ( Now Known As ... vs Assessee on 6 December, 2012 आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, अिधकरण मुंबई Ûयायपीठ 'एफ ' मुंबई ... वष[ / Assessment Years :2007-08 & 2008-09 M/s. Venus Records & Tapes बनाम/ बनाम The Addl. CIT-11(1), Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Aayakar
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next