Learned Additional Advocate General further justified
the differential tariff on the factors that can be taken note of, viz. nature
of supply and the purpose ... tariff fixed by TNERC, he justified the
method of fixation of tariff in these cases. According to him, in order to
avoid tariff shock
preferential tariff for
purchase of physical energy alone and the generator may end
up realizing more than the preferential tariff under the RE
mechanism ... ultimate consumer of power who will be
subject to tariff shock as there would be a clear dis-insentive
for RE generators to enter into
taken a low tension power supply with
permission to use 10HP under Tariff III-A and had been in payment of
regular charges in respect ... unit. On 19.12.1999, the petitioner shocked to receive a notice
from the fifth respondent alleging that the Tariff has been wrongly applied
in the case
connection vide HT SC No.447 in the year 2005 under HT Tariff-IA, which
is industrial category purpose. The appellant, as a welfare measure ... towards shortfall amount due to wrong application of
Tariff for the period 04/2009 to 11/2011 and in the same order, it was
communicated
basis of the
concession announced by the Government to extend power tariff, is a legitimate
expectation which cannot be denied by the respondents ... from the total sanctioned load of 4950 KVA, to their
shock and surprise of the petitioner, the 5th respondent vide letter dated
31.08.2015, informed
invoices from the month of June 2013, based on the new
preferential tariff scheme. But the 3rd respondent was not prompt in
releasing the payments ... terms and conditions
of the agreement. While being so, to the shock and surprise, the 2 nd
respondent has issued showcause notice
Petitioner, the order of the First Respondent is made in Wind Energy Tariff Order No.1 of 2009 dated 20.03.2009 to adjustment of higher slot ... First Respondent.
7.It comes to be known that the Tariff Order No.1 dated 20.03.2009 was appealed before the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity, however
several items in the same wagon is in violation of the Red Tariff. To substantiate this contention, the plaintiff examined Sri A. Srinivasan ... hydro sulphate are kept in a sealed water-tight wagon, any shock or jerk would cause friction and heat in potassium chlorate and that will
E.I.D.Parry (I) Ltd vs The State Of Tamil Nadu Rep on 6
further grievance of the Company that to the shock and
surprise of the Company, the Defendant had mischievously sent a predated
letter to the Company ... claim of the Company was rejected in terms of Indian Motor
Tariff (IMT) 13 of the policy conditions. It was the claim of the Company
