extended certain incentives and concessions__?i:iii§;|ud.iVno'
electricity supply tariff to the pmonerenarei
.h.e.e!s. According-igr, they have ... ttie serne has
been communicated by Assistant
vide Annexure:" to the shock
and surtsrise '' petitioner received a
oommun_icatiuotn
Karnataka Power Transmission ... vs Muizz Ahmad Shariff on 23 January, 2025
-1-
WA No. 861
Bangalore Electricity Supply Company ... vs Kumari Chandana K on 23 January, 2025
-1-
WA No
Karnataka Power Transmission ... vs Mrs. Rekha on 23 January, 2025
-1-
WA No. 861 of
digested food
in the stomach of the deceased Muniswamy. Rule 38
CA tariff No.24 Part I, the passenger carriage or take
any carriage ... died. The Post Morterm Report
reveals that the cause of death was shock and
hemorrhage due to crush injury and amputation of both
power tarifi ai'ei5'f--«_
extend the benefits of power tariff under HT2i'a) "
petitioner - Company from June §z004 ... Govemmentvdirections. ifurttter,
petitioner has souht fora a respondents to
adjust the excess tariff Ayoolfilected 2006 in the
2. Thevyénlgygrieyen-ee pefitioner in the instant
writ
Telecom Employees Co-Operative ... vs Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, ... on 23 August, 1990
Equivalent citations
Bharat Gold Mines Officers' ... vs Union Of India And Ors. on 16 March, 2001
H.T. Somashekar Reddy vs Government Of Karnataka And Another on 21 September, 1998
Equivalent
Kiocl Limited vs Railway Board on 17 April, 2013
Author: S.Abdul Nazeer
Bench: S
