tariff shock?
(c) Whether the State Commission while
increasing the tariff causing tariff
shock has violated its own
Regulations 5(3) of the Tariff
Regulations ... categories of consumers and while re-
determining the tariff the Commission shall ensure
that no tariff shock is caused to any other category
tariff of the Appellant was increased from
Rs.3.75 to Rs.5.90 i.e. 58% increase. This resulted in
the tariff shock ... tariff of the Appellant
has been increased from Rs.3.75 to R.5.90 i.e. 58%
increase. This has led to tariff shock
commercial consumers
could not be subjected to exorbitant increase in tariff
and tariff shock just because they consume electricity in
air conditioning and lighting ... Appellants have been subjected to disproportionate and
exorbitant increase in tariff and tariff shock against the
dictum laid down by this Tribunal in a number
require increase in tariff of subsidized LT consumers by
110% of the pre-revised tariff causing greater tariff
shock to them. This would be evident ... tariff petition. If the
tariff was to be increased for the entire revenue gap it
would have resulted in a tariff shock to all categories
been a manifold increase in
the Cross Subsidy Surcharge causing tariff shock to the
Appellants. This is in violation of Section 61(g) , National
Electricity ... order dated 4.4.2013 by increasing
Cross Subsidy Surcharge exponentially causing tariff shock to
the consumers. It was not possible to de-link the exercise
they have adhered to the approved Power
Procurement Plan.
vi) Tariff shock inflicted upon 33 kV and 11
consumers: The difference in tariff between
Page ... that the
difference between the tariffs across the
voltage categories is justifiable and inevitable,
the proportion of the tariff shock inflicted
upon the tariff categories
normal rise due to inflation and other
factors may result in tariff shock in the subsequent year
which may not be in the interest ... light of reforms envisaged in the power
sector through National Tariff Policy post 6th January,
2011 to promote competition in the power Sector.
Further
cost will constitute the
basis for tariff fixation, and no revision would be entertained
till the next tariff period. This direction presupposes that ... project as well, in the interest of avoidance of
tariff shocks down stream. In case the projects exempted from
CEA clearance, the Commission would consider
M/S Ferro Alloys Corporation Limited vs Odisha Electricity Regulatory ... on 23 September, 2013
Appeal
Beta Wind Farm (P) Limited vs Tamil Nadu Electricity Regulatory ... on 24 May, 2013
Appeal
