deleted the addition on the
ground of double taxation and by applying telescoping.
6. The Id. CIT(A) erred in sustaining the addition of alleged ... case and in
law, the Id. CIT(A) erred in granting telescoping benefit in respect
of unaccounted receipts of Rs.4,47,46,950/- against
deleted the addition on the
ground of double taxation and by applying telescoping.
6. The Id. CIT(A) erred in sustaining the addition of alleged ... case and in
law, the Id. CIT(A) erred in granting telescoping benefit in respect
of unaccounted receipts of Rs.4,47,46,950/- against
deleted the addition on the
ground of double taxation and by applying telescoping.
6. The Id. CIT(A) erred in sustaining the addition of alleged ... case and in
law, the Id. CIT(A) erred in granting telescoping benefit in respect
of unaccounted receipts of Rs.4,47,46,950/- against
deleted the addition on the
ground of double taxation and by applying telescoping.
6. The Id. CIT(A) erred in sustaining the addition of alleged ... case and in
law, the Id. CIT(A) erred in granting telescoping benefit in respect
of unaccounted receipts of Rs.4,47,46,950/- against
deleted the addition on the
ground of double taxation and by applying telescoping.
6. The Id. CIT(A) erred in sustaining the addition of alleged ... case and in
law, the Id. CIT(A) erred in granting telescoping benefit in respect
of unaccounted receipts of Rs.4,47,46,950/- against
deleted the addition on the
ground of double taxation and by applying telescoping.
6. The Id. CIT(A) erred in sustaining the addition of alleged ... case and in
law, the Id. CIT(A) erred in granting telescoping benefit in respect
of unaccounted receipts of Rs.4,47,46,950/- against
deleted the addition on the
ground of double taxation and by applying telescoping.
6. The Id. CIT(A) erred in sustaining the addition of alleged ... case and in
law, the Id. CIT(A) erred in granting telescoping benefit in respect
of unaccounted receipts of Rs.4,47,46,950/- against
deleted the addition on the
ground of double taxation and by applying telescoping.
6. The Id. CIT(A) erred in sustaining the addition of alleged ... case and in
law, the Id. CIT(A) erred in granting telescoping benefit in respect
of unaccounted receipts of Rs.4,47,46,950/- against
deleted the addition on the
ground of double taxation and by applying telescoping.
6. The Id. CIT(A) erred in sustaining the addition of alleged ... case and in
law, the Id. CIT(A) erred in granting telescoping benefit in respect
of unaccounted receipts of Rs.4,47,46,950/- against
deleted the addition on the
ground of double taxation and by applying telescoping.
6. The Id. CIT(A) erred in sustaining the addition of alleged ... case and in
law, the Id. CIT(A) erred in granting telescoping benefit in respect
of unaccounted receipts of Rs.4,47,46,950/- against
