connected with a temple are not religious activities.
The management of a temple or maintenance of discipline and order inside the
temple can be controlled ... servants of the
temple, including the priests, may be given to the Temple Committee appointed
by the State. The Temple Committee can decide the quantum
Inam been vested with the Temple, no compensation paid to the Temple for
depriving the property right of the Temple. This error has been pointed ... being a
tenant under the Temple and had executed muchalika in favour of the Temple
in turn, the Temple has issued patta in their favour
contended by the
Mahomadans,
4. that the Kasiviswanathaswamy temple and Theertham belong to
plaintiff,
5. that the Giri Veedhi and other streets referred ... plaintiff ( temple devasthanam) makes
it clear that the Government conducted itself as the owners of the hill and no act
was done by the contending
Arulmighu Pandi Muneeswarar Temple (hereinafter called for “Temple”)
is a village Temple near Melamadai, Madurai declared as exempted temple as per the
order passed ... that the temple was a
excepted one as trusteeship was hereditary. The Board accepted the contention and
declared the temple is excepted temple and found
grant free of tax been made to support the sub
temples of Sri Ranganathaswamy Temple as Devadayam. The learned
Senior counsel for the appellants referring ... provisions of
the Act 30 of 1963. Under Section 44 of the Act, the pre-existing right
vested with the Temple is not only
grant free of tax been made to support the sub
temples of Sri Ranganathaswamy Temple as Devadayam. The learned
counsel for the appellants referring ... provisions of
the Act 30 of 1963. Under Section 44 of the Act, the pre-existing right
vested with the Temple is not only
grant free of tax been made to support the sub
temples of Sri Ranganathaswamy Temple as Devadayam. The learned
counsel for the appellants referring ... provisions of
the Act 30 of 1963. Under Section 44 of the Act, the pre-existing right
vested with the Temple is not only
grant free of tax been made to support the sub
temples of Sri Ranganathaswamy Temple as Devadayam. The learned
Senior counsel for the appellants referring ... provisions of
the Act 30 of 1963. Under Section 44 of the Act, the pre-existing right
vested with the Temple is not only
grant free of tax been made to support the sub
temples of Sri Ranganathaswamy Temple as Devadayam. The learned
counsel for the appellants referring ... provisions of
the Act 30 of 1963. Under Section 44 of the Act, the pre-existing right
vested with the Temple is not only
that the land
belongs to the Temple and the Temple is governed by H.R. & C.E. Act, the learned
Single Judge directed ... notice to
the Temple authorities. The temple authorities did not participate in the enquiry.
Therefore, for the fault of the Temple authorities, the cultivating tenant
