Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 28 (0.98 seconds)

J.Mullai vs A.Panneerselvam

petition and the respondent has acted bona fide in the interest of the plaintiff temple. There was absolutely no basis for initiating any criminal action ... granted patta in favour of the temple, but the present Executive Officer of the temple i.e, the revision petitioner had stated in the present

Sivakumar vs A. Radhakrishnan

act, under Section 2(c)(iii) of the Contempt of Court Act, 1971, which is punishable under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act ... Kattalaidharar”, whereas, as regards these two temples, viz., Arulmighu Kaamanatheeswarar Temple, Salem and Sakthi Vinayagar Temple, Krishnagiri, he admits that he is not a Trustee
Madras High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - P N Prakash - Full Document

Vinod Aged 38 Years vs State Of Kerala

concerning administration of Madathilkarazhma SNDP Sakha No.188 and its properties, including temples, situated in Oachira Village. The Police requested for the intervention ... take over and to act as Crl.MC No.2361/2013 3 the receiver of SNDP Madathikarazhma temple and Sakha No.188 administration. The Assistant
Kerala High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - A Hariprasad - Full Document

Palani vs The Inspector Of Police

received an information that the petitioners were conducting temple festival at Vinayagar and Rajeswari Ammal Temple which belongs to Vishvakarma Community people. So, he visited ... about 23.50 p.m., temple festival was celebrated in Vinayagar and Rajeswari Ammal Temple which is situated in Srivilliputhur. The officials, on knowing about
Madras High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - G Ilangovan - Full Document

- vs -

satisfy his lust, he had taken the deceased girl to the Kali Temple. Thereafter, the accused took her to an isolated place and committed ... POCSO Act and 3(2)(V) of SC/ST Act (Ex.P.23). The respondent police, after enquiry, arrested the accused and after a detailed
Madras High Court Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Manikandan vs State Represented By

another aspect. In fact, sweeping amendments have been made by Central Act 5 of 2009 with effect from 01.11.2010 curtailing the powers to arrest, especially ... imprisonment for three years. To illustrate, if a Watchman of a temple has seen the thief running away with the idol, but, unfortunately, the idol
Madras High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - P N Prakash - Full Document
1   2 3 Next