Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 270 (1.30 seconds)

Sri La Sri Harihara Sri Gnanasambanda vs The Commissioner on 1 December, 2023

Mutt also administers four temples in Thanjavur District and Tiruvarur District, namely Agniswarar Temple, Kanjaur, Sakshinatheswarar Temple, https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ... Kaichinam Kaichineswarar Temple and Pannakaparanar Temple. Arulmigh Agniswaraswami Temple belongs to Madurai Thirugnana Sambandar Adheenam and for better administration of the temple, the District Court
Madras High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - S Srimathy - Full Document

Sri La Sri Harihara Sri Gnanasambanda vs The Commissioner on 1 December, 2023

administers four temples in Thanjavur District and Tiruvarur District, namely Agniswarar Temple, Kanjaur, Sakshinatheswarar Temple, Thiruppurambiyam, Kaichinam Kaichineswarar Temple and Pannakaparanar Temple. Arulmigh ... inconsistent with the context, the act means the Madras Hindu Religions and charitable Endowments Act, 1959 (Madras Act 22 of 1959) and all other words
Madras High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - S Srimathy - Full Document

M.Arunachalam vs The Commissioner

submitted that Arulmighu Koppudayanayagi Amman temple is a public religious temple listed under section 46 (iii) of the Act. The temple is being administered ... thereafter Act 22 of 1959 was amended vide Act 46 of 1991, wherein under Section 61 of Act 46 of 1991 has stated that every
Madras High Court Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - S Srimathy - Full Document

Thirumalai Muthu vs The Commissioner

temple is an 'excepted temple' vide Board order in O.A.No.424 of 1926 dated 25.02.1927, thereby the administration of the temple ... hereditary trustees. In the present temple, the peculiar facts of the said temple are that the hereditary trustees are acting as poojaries of the temple
Madras High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - S Srimathy - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next