doubt that the Administrator Sri
Jagannath Temple is a proprietary status under Sri
Jaganath Temple Act and he is the custodian of all
movable ... Act by
insertion of Sections 2(oo) and 3A in the OEA Act,
1951 , as the operation of the said Act and the
Temple Act
doubt that the Administrator Sri
Jagannath Temple is a proprietary status under Sri
Jaganath Temple Act and he is the custodian of all
movable ... Act by
insertion of Sections 2(oo) and 3A in the OEA Act,
1951 , as the operation of the said Act and the
Temple Act
authorization was granted by the Temple Committee, as required by the
Shree Jagannath Temple Act .
(iii) The petitioner contended that his application to purchase ... belonging to
Lord Jagannath Temple, is classified as public property, vested with the
Temple Administration under the Shree Jagannath Temple Act, 1955 .
Temple land, being
brief, is
that the temple of Lord Shri Jagannath Mahaprabhu
situated at Puri is an ancient temple. The said temple
ever since its inception ... maintenance, administration and governance of the
temple affairs, the Government took over the charge.
Accordingly, Shri Jagannath Temple Act, 1952 came
into force.
2.2. Having
appealable in nature as per Section 24 of the Shree Jagannath
Temple Act. In reply and response to the above, learned counsel for
the petitioner ... challenge is appealable in view
of Section 24 of Shree Jagannath Temple Act, the Court is of the
considered view that the petitioner should approach
addressed by the Appeal Committee latter as per
the Shree Jagannath Temple Act, 1956 ."
2.2. The petitioners claimed to have argued that the
Danadhyakshya ... Administrator envisaged under Section 21(2)(i) of the
Shree Jagannath Temple Act, 1955, held at paragraph
10 as follows:
"Therefore, this
read with Section 30 A (4) (b) of Shree
Jagannath Temple Act has been taken against the
Page 1 of 3
petitioner.
3. The prosecution ... allegation against the petitioner that,
on 17.08.2015, the Administrator of Shree Jagannath
Temple, Puri lodged a written complaint alleging that,
before the Pahandi
Shri Jagannath Temple Act, 1955 (in short, "the Act") for
constitution of Committee of the Temple Management.
3. Upon hearing learned counsel ... Act. No further guideline has been
prepared for nomination of Sevaks to be the members of the
Committee of the Temple.
5. In that view
State of Odisha and others .... Opp. Parties
Mr. Subrat Satpathy, Advocate
(For Temple Administration)
CORAM:
JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order ... Act, 1955 (for
brevity 'the Act'). He, therefore, prays for withdrawal of this writ
petition to avail the remedy under the Act
proceeding initiated under Section 15(b) of the Shree
Jagannath Temple Act, 1954 which was initiated by the
father of the petitioners registered as Misc
