Jai Singh And Anr. vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 28 January, 1993
public temple was to practice Untouchability. (See P. S. Charya v. State of Madras , AIR 1956 Madras 541).
31. The Madras Temple Entry Authorising
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 847 (4.18 seconds)Daya Ram vs Emperor on 5 December, 1929
perform pooja and not as to the right of entry into any temple or mosque. After the amendment of the Code no doubt remained ... provisions of that section attaching to disputes as regards the entry into a temple or mosque. In the present case a samadh
Murugan vs State Of Tamilnadu on 20 March, 2012
counsel for the petitioners.
Post this matter after six weeks."
Temple Entry denied :-
21.Even earlier a suit was filed ... temple.
The Communist Party of India (Marxist), instrumental in demolishing the
wall that divided the Dalits from the upper caste Hindus, hailed the temple
entry
Need To Provide Special Package For Infrastructure Development Of Sabarimala ... on 28 December, 2018
Title: Need to provide special package for infrastructure development of Sabarimala Temple in Kerala.
SHRI N.K. PREMACHANDRAN ( KOLLAM ): Thank you very much, Madam Speaker ... Centre.
Further, due to the hon. Supreme Court’s verdict regarding temple entry to women between the age of 10 and 50 years, made
C. Periaswami Goundan And Ors vs Sundaresa Iyer And Ors on 31 July, 1964
surviving heirs of the present
incumbent" no entry is made. Obviously no entries are made
under these sub-heads, as the deity cannot have ... only be the stanika who was managing the temple and its
properties. The relevant entries in the inam register do
not countenance any contention that
Velappa Goundan And Ors. vs Ramaswami Goundan And Ors. on 24 January, 1938
provisions of that section attaching to disputes as regards' entry into a temple or mosque. Ram Saran Pathak v. Raghu Nandan ... entering into it and not so much with his actual entry into the temple nevertheless where the right regarding which a dispute exists
The State Of Gujarat vs Kanabhai Ambabhai on 28 February, 2018
also with the
utterances indicating that complainant's entry into
the temple, would malign it. Apart from the fact that
such attribution is lacking ... temple, it will get
maligned. In the crossexamination, the victim
admitted that adjoining the temple in question, there
is another temple of God Hanuman
Recently In Indian Young Lawyers ... vs . The on 27 November, 2018
Kerala Hindu Places of Public
Worship (Auhorisation of Entry)Rules, 1965,
facilitating entry of women of all age groups form the
basic challenge in these ... even the convicts are having a
right to pray in Temples and their entry
cannot be prevented. There is no law in the
country which
State vs Mahesh & Ors on 23 September, 2015
opined that H.P. Pandey had ante-mortem entry
wound present over left temple with blackening and exit wound
triangular in shape present over right ... Shokal. The deceased Vijender
Kumar Shokal had suffered ante-mortem entry wound over left temple
with blackening and tattooing over bone and brain matter
State vs Mahesh & Ors on 23 September, 2015
opined that H.P. Pandey had ante-mortem entry
wound present over left temple with blackening and exit wound
triangular in shape present over right ... Shokal. The deceased Vijender
Kumar Shokal had suffered ante-mortem entry wound over left temple
with blackening and tattooing over bone and brain matter