comprised in the opening words. Each word in an entry or each entry in a list should not be so read as excluding or reducing ... fell to be considered there was whether the Madras Temple Entry Authorisation and Indemnity Act of 1939 was within the legislative competence of the Provincial
Charitable and Hindu Religious
Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Endowments Act, 1987') (which is equal to section ... Act, 1966 and hereinafter referred to as 'the Endowments Act, 1966'), in which entries are made regarding the nature of the temple
provisions of the Act of 1955 are not applicable to the lands belonging to the temple. The relevant provisions of the Act of 1955 also ... Survey Numbers belong to the temple. To prove that the lands belong to the temple, reliance was placed on entries in the book of Endowments
entries in the Register maintained under Section 38 of the repealed Act 17 of 1966 corresponding to Section 43 of the Endowments Act ... lands in the name of the temple is set aside, the question of deletion of entries does not arise.
4. I do not find
Religious Institutions and Endowments Act,
1987 ( for short, the Act, 1987).
6. Learned standing counsel further contended that
respondent-temple is a public institution ... temple Adyapaka Service is not controverted.
9. As per Section 38 of the old Act and Section 43 of the new
Act, it is mandatory
power conferred, or discharging any duty imposed, by or under this Act.
(2) If any such officer is resisted in the exercise of such power ... Act. It is well known that there could be no such thing as an unregulated and unrestricted right of entry in a public temple
came to the conclusion that the Hanuman temple in question is a private temple, but not.a public temple and therefore the order of the Deputy ... temple. The payment of electricity charges by the plaintiffs is not relevant to determine whether the temple is a public temple or a private temple
proceedings of the Commissioner dated 04.02.2016 supra in
bringing the temple as public temple under the control of
Endowments Department. About 871 villagers of Pingadi ... private temple. One registered
society as development committee of the temple vide No.120 of
2009 in claiming as managing the temple till
temple and the patta issued by the Inam Deputy Tahsildar is not available with T.T.D. except the entries in the Inam B-register ... They handed over the Tirumala Temple to the Mahanths in 1843. From the administration of Mahanths, Tirumala Temple was handed over to the Government
claim to be the Poojaris of the temple. It is the claim of the temple that the temple is the absolute owner of the property ... framed under Section 57 of the H.R. & C.A. Act (old Act) is no bar for the defendants contending that the property
