market share at a given point of time.
KAL enjoyed credit facilities from diverse banks and financial institutions
under a consortium agreement. The respondent ... temporary overdraft for such purpose. United Bank of India
allowed temporary overdraft to KAL. KAL utilized the same. This
temporary overdraft facility was over
distinguished from securing èmere temporary or day-to-day accommodation, or from, banking or overdraft facilities, and may be either by way of addition ... Ascot Gas Water Heaters Ltd. v. Duff, who considered a temporary accommodation to be an ordinary incident in carrying on the business. In a commercial
benefit. It is quite possible that the overdraft facility in a particular case may involve a temporary short-term loan or accommodation covering a small ... above ordinarily, the overdraft facility gives an advantage of an enduring character because the person in whose favour the overdraft facility is given
export of machinery by the company and asked for a temporary overdraft of 1,000/- to be cleared by April 15, 1952. The credits were ... overdraft. On April 9 1952, W. explained to the Bank that the credits had been extended to April 26, 1952, and asked for the overdraft
Corporation applied to the assessee bank for grant of temporary financial accommodation to the extent of 1 million. The reason for seeking the financial accommodation ... Mulajore station. On the 31st May 1950 the assessee sanctioned the overdraft facility of 1 million in the Corporation's said current account with
Lloyds Bank, Ltd. vs P.E. Guzdar And Co. on 10 April, 1929
Equivalent citations
Sm. Sumitra Debi Jalan vs Satya Narayan Prahladka And Ors. on 26 March, 1964
Equivalent
Sailendra Nath Mitter And Anr. vs Emperor on 1 September, 1942
Equivalent citations: AIR1944CAL92, AIR
Kalipada Banerjee vs Sree Bank Ltd. (In Liquidation) on 27 November, 1959
Equivalent citations: AIR1960CAL285
Hindusthan Commercial Bank Ltd. vs Probodh Kumar Mitter And Anr. on 6 February, 1979
Equivalent
