Bank. Accused No.1 also allowed
accused No.2 to avail Temporary Overdraft Facility (for
short 'TOD') and local cheque discounting facility although
proprietor of M/s. Vee Kay
Pictures and availed temporary overdraft facility from UCO Bank,
chandni chowk branch, Delhi, from time to time ... which was never effected
upon him. Accused claimed that he had temporary overdraft
facility from the bank and this fact was concealed
Cb I vs . 1 Sh. S Satish Kumar S/O Sh. P C Rao, on
Cbi vs 1. Om Prakash Sharma on 24 August, 2013
Om Prakash Sharma etc. Judgment
terms of criminal conspiracy, accommodation cheques were
purchased indiscriminately and temporary overdraft facility had been granted
much beyond the discretionary powers. As per the banking ... pertains to purchase of cheques beyond discretionary
power and grant of temporary overdraft beyond discretionary powers only.
ROLE OF BOTH THE BANK OFFICIALS
with Syndicate Bank, Gugai Branch, Salem and applied for a secured overdraft of Rs.10 lakhs on 30.04.2004 for developing the Jewelery business by offering ... abusing their official position had processed and sanctioned Secured overdraft facility of Rs.24.75 lakhs on 22.01.2004 in favour of M/s Roshini Silvers
only
and had discretionary powers of permitting Temporary Over Draft (TOD) up to
Rs.10000/- only. Such powers were revised with effect from ... even otherwise not competent to purchase any cheque or grant any
temporary overdraft.
iv. Moreover, other bank officials like Sh. JDK Jain and Sh. Prem
R.Ramesh Srinivasan (A1) vs State Represented By
Author: G.Jayachandran
Bench: G.Jayachandran
IN
State By Cbi/Acb vs Sri. M.S.Seetharama Rao on 21 March, 2016
IN
Central Bureau Of Investigation vs Sri.A.E.Devendranath on 31 August, 2016
IN THE