Chander Bhushan Anand And Ors. vs Union Of India (Uoi) Through Finance ... on 9 November, 2004
supra), vires of Section 6(2) of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 and the validity of a notification issued by the Government
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 170 (0.91 seconds)Ramphal @ Ramphool And Ors vs Ramesh Chand Mehta Etc on 14 May, 2018
others (supra), is interpreting specific
provisions of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1948 ,
wherein in Section 4 , the words used ... definition of the tenant as
given in the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 , which uses
the word "deemed to be tenant
Chandgi Ram vs State Of Haryana And Others on 8 July, 2013
supra) while considering Section 84-C of the Bombay
Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 also held that the
suo motu powers should be exercised
Krishan Singh Rana vs Haryana State Industrial Development ... on 23 March, 2000
tenant of the property under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 and seeks a reference of that issue by the Civil Court
Babu Singh vs State Of Haryana on 31 August, 2013
supra) while considering Section 84-C of the Bombay
Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 also held that the
suo motu powers should be exercised
Krishan Kumar And Ors vs Financial Commissioner And Ors on 14 January, 2015
supra) while considering Section
84-C of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural
Lands Act, 1948 also held that the suo motu
powers should be exercised
Bhawar Singh And Another vs State Of Haryana And Others on 19 March, 2025
Impugned Act"). It was an Act further to amend the Bombay
Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 (Bom. LXVII of 1948)
(hereinafter called
Abhey Singh vs Birbal Dass And Another on 6 December, 2011
Whether permission under Section 63 of
the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948,
was obtained because the sale or intended sale was in
favour
Mahabir Parshad Ganeriwala vs The State Of Haryana And Others on 19 August, 2013
supra) while considering Section 84-C of the Bombay Tenancy
and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 also held that the suo motu
powers should be exercised
Bhaiya Ram Hargo Lal vs Mahavir Prasad Murari Lal Mahajan on 26 July, 1968
contained in the Transfer of property act, the presidency Small Cause courts Act or the Indian Contract Act , no order or decree for the recovery ... West Bengal Act 5 of 1948 and the same was in turn replaced by the West Bengal Act 38 of 1948 which ultimately gave place