view that forfeiture of security tendered by the appellant CHA is sufficient punishment and revocation is not warranted. Accordingly, we set aside the order ... revocation and direct the Commissioner of Customs (General) to restore the CHA licence subject to the forfeiture of entire security amount tendered
view that forfeiture of security tendered by the appellant CHA is sufficient punishment and revocation is not warranted. Accordingly, we set aside the order ... revocation and direct the Commissioner of Customs (General) to restore the CHA licence subject to the forfeiture of entire security amount tendered
sought revocation of the tender of pardon granted to Mr Rajiv Saxena
wherein it was stated that Mr Rajiv Saxena withheld full and true facts
view
that forfeiture of security tendered by the appellant CHA is sufficient
punishment and revocation is not warranted. Accordingly, we set aside the
order ... revocation and direct the Principal Commissioner of Customs
(General) to restore the CHA licence subject to the forfeiture of entire
security amount tendered
view that forfeiture of security tendered by the appellant CHA
is sufficient punishment and revocation is not warranted. Accordingly, we
set aside the order ... revocation and direct the Principal
Commissioner of Customs (General) to restore the CHA licence subject to
the forfeiture of entire security amount tendered
88496/2018
that forfeiture of security tendered by the appellant CHA is sufficient
punishment and revocation is not warranted. Accordingly, we set aside the
order ... revocation and direct the Principal Commissioner of Customs
(General) to restore the CHA licence subject to the forfeiture of entire
security amount tendered
view
that forfeiture of security tendered by the appellant CHA is sufficient
punishment and revocation is not warranted. Accordingly, we set aside the
order ... revocation and direct the Commissioner of Customs (General)
to restore the CHA licence subject to the forfeiture of entire security amount
tendered
alia,
'7(ii) Whether in circumstances of the case, punishment of
revocation of licence under Regulation 20 of CHALR, 2004
should not be imposed ... Tribunal has held
that forfeiture of security tendered by the CHA is sufficient
punishment and revocation is not warranted and accordingly
set aside the order
view
that forfeiture of security tendered by the appellant CHA is sufficient
punishment and revocation is not warranted. Accordingly, we set aside the
order ... revocation and direct the Principal Commissioner of Customs
(General) to restore the CHA licence subject to the forfeiture of entire
security amount tendered
view
that forfeiture of security tendered by the appellant CHA is sufficient
punishment and revocation is not warranted. Accordingly, we set aside the
order ... revocation and direct the Principal Commissioner of Customs
(General) to restore the CHA licence subject to the forfeiture of entire
security amount tendered
