calendar years from the date of his
appointment till the termination of his service and he has rendered more
than 240 days of continuous service ... every calendar year before his
termination. The respondent-employer terminated the services of appellant-
workman on 27.7.1998 as per practice with the reason ‘sanction expired
before the Conciliation
Officer requesting for setting aside the order of termination as the same
is void ab initio in law and sought an order ... filed their respective statements inter
alia justifying their demand and order of termination passed against the
workman. The respondent-management has taken preliminary objections
contending
been removed from the services of the Corporation. No order
of termination from his services was served upon the appellant-workman on
that ... year from the date of his
appointment till the date of his termination from the services of the
respondent-Corporation.
5. The appellant-workman raised
mandatory in nature, have not been
complied with and as such, the termination of the services of the
respondent by the appellant is illegal ... referred to it, in favour of the respondent, stating thereby that the
termination of the services of the workman was illegal and was liable
Further condition no.8 of the said letter reads thus:
“TERMINATION:
Condition no.8: Notwithstanding anything contained herein, the Corporation
shall be at liberty ... Corporation in respect of any matter or thing antecedent to such
termination.”
On 17.11.1971 the partnership deed was signed between respondent
allowed after quashing the show cause notices issued and
orders of termination of services of the respondent-employees. The Division
Bench of the High Court ... sought for issuance of a writ of prohibition restraining the appellants
from termination of their services from their posts in pursuance of the
impugned show
respondent-Department and
that he has worked from 1.1.1987 till his termination from 1.4.1992 and he
has been paid his salary on daily wage basis ... Rules, 1957. Thus it was held
by the Labour Court that the termination order passed against the workman
is illegal and void ab initio
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter,
“the Act”). Aggrieved by the order of termination, the appellant raised an
industrial dispute before the Labour Court, Kanpur narrating ... said post and pay him
50% back wages from the date of termination till the date of passing of the
Award.
The correctness
acquired any right, in respect of the
property in question after the termination of lease by efflux of time on
10.08.1968 and also by termination ... time.
The concurrent findings recorded by the courts below declaring the
termination notice dated 01.09.1972, terminating the lease of the property
in question granted
said Writ
Petition filed by the appellant in limine and upheld the termination order
dated 22.08.2008 passed against the appellant by the Delhi School Tribunal ... very wide and any kind of
termination would fall within its ambit. Accordingly, the Writ Petition was
disposed of with liberty granted to the petitioner
