entered
into separate joint developmental agreements between the
years 2010 and 2015. It was further stated that the joint
development agreements covering in total ... issued notice dated
16.07.2022 to the appellant reiterating the termination of Joint
-7-
Development Agreements. It was stated that the Memorandum
of Understanding dated
appears to have entered into distinct Joint
Development Agreements on various dates for implementing the
joint development of lands as contemplated under the
memorandum ... petitioner and Manyata Infrastructure Development, a
private entity issues a notice to the respondent/Company regarding
termination of Joint Development Agreement, quantifying damages
and calling
appears to have entered into distinct Joint
Development Agreements on various dates for implementing the
joint development of lands as contemplated under the
memorandum ... petitioner and Manyata Infrastructure Development, a
private entity issues a notice to the respondent/Company regarding
termination of Joint Development Agreement, quantifying damages
and calling
appears to have entered into distinct Joint
Development Agreements on various dates for implementing the
joint development of lands as contemplated under the
memorandum ... petitioner and Manyata Infrastructure Development, a
private entity issues a notice to the respondent/Company regarding
termination of Joint Development Agreement, quantifying damages
and calling
made fit for
development, it is at that stage that the
complainant has issued a termination notice
terminating the Joint Development Agreements
and the General ... perusal of the Joint Development Agreement
also indicates that there is no time period
prescribed in the Joint Development Agreement
period under the joint development agreement
ended on 29.04.2018.
5. Respondent No.2 did not complete the project. The
loan agreement executed between PHL Fininvest ... issued a termination notice on
16.08.2022 stating that respondent No. 2 has failed
to comply the terms of a joint development
agreement. Till 2022, respondent
petitioner. The
conditions in the agreement go wrong. The agreement is
terminated. After the termination of the agreement, it
transpires that several civil proceedings ... Joint Development
Agreement with Skyline Constructions on 07/03/2007.
However as there was no activity done till date, we had
terminated the agreement
lease agreement. He placed
reliance on Clause 5 of the agreement which reads thus:
"5. If the lease of Phase I Development does ... that the
termination of tenancy amounted to splitting of tenancy and
such termination is bad in law. It is undisputed that two
termination notices were
lease agreement. He placed
reliance on Clause 5 of the agreement which reads thus:
"5. If the lease of Phase I Development does ... that the
termination of tenancy amounted to splitting of tenancy and
such termination is bad in law. It is undisputed that two
termination notices were
lease agreement. He placed
reliance on Clause 5 of the agreement which reads thus:
"5. If the lease of Phase I Development does ... that the
termination of tenancy amounted to splitting of tenancy and
such termination is bad in law. It is undisputed that two
termination notices were
