Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 174 (1.54 seconds)

Manikandan vs State Represented By

evidence for dock identification. In a given case, if the police do not want corroborative evidence via Test Identification Parade proceedings, it is their choice ... Test Identification Parade proceedings. The Code of Criminal Procedure has been there in various forms since 1862 and the police were conducting Test Identification Parade
Madras High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - P N Prakash - Full Document

Hansraj vs The State Of M.P. on 21 December, 2022

proceedings for identification have been held, the witness' reliability has not been put to a test. In short, a test identification is designed ... Test Identification parade they did not constitute substantive evidence. Failure to held the test identification would not make inadmissible the evidence of identification
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - R K Verma - Full Document

Heeralal vs State Of M.P. on 22 February, 2018

prepared test identification memo Ex.P- 25. On 17/6/1996, K.L. Yadav (PW-4), conducted the TIP of seized articles from ... prosecution witnesses Kailash, Girraj, Mintabai and Guddibai and prepared test identification memo of the articles Ex.P- 7. (2.8) In the course of investigation
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mohan Singh vs State on 18 March, 1987

then searched for the missing articles and on the same day they filed a list of the articles which had been taken away ... refused to take part in the Test Identification Parade. At the instance of Ram Pal Singh accused, articles of Jewellery consisting of three Gold Bangles
Delhi High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next