prepared
the Test Identification Chart and he put his signature on the Test
Identification Chart and this witness proved the Test Identification Chart ... holding the Test Identification Parade of
the appellants for identification during investigation was meaningless
because the purpose of Test Identification Parade for identification is only
prepared
the Test Identification Chart and he put his signature on the Test
Identification Chart and this witness proved the Test Identification Chart ... holding the Test Identification Parade of
the appellants for identification during investigation was meaningless
because the purpose of Test Identification Parade for identification is only
prepared
the Test Identification Chart and he put his signature on the Test
Identification Chart and this witness proved the Test Identification Chart ... holding the Test Identification Parade of
the appellants for identification during investigation was meaningless
because the purpose of Test Identification Parade for identification is only
house of Accused No. 1 during the Test Identification Parade held for
identification of those articles. In this connection, he further pointed
Patna High Court ... Test Identification Parade. Accused No. 1, however, was put on Test
Identification Parade on 17.05.2006 in Sub-Jail, Danapur. The Test
Identification Parade was conducted
house of Accused No. 1 during the Test Identification Parade held for
identification of those articles. In this connection, he further pointed
Patna High Court ... Test Identification Parade. Accused No. 1, however, was put on Test
Identification Parade on 17.05.2006 in Sub-Jail, Danapur. The Test
Identification Parade was conducted
house of Accused No. 1 during the Test Identification Parade held for
identification of those articles. In this connection, he further pointed
Patna High Court ... Test Identification Parade. Accused No. 1, however, was put on Test
Identification Parade on 17.05.2006 in Sub-Jail, Danapur. The Test
Identification Parade was conducted
house of Accused No. 1 during the Test Identification Parade held for
identification of those articles. In this connection, he further pointed
Patna High Court ... Test Identification Parade. Accused No. 1, however, was put on Test
Identification Parade on 17.05.2006 in Sub-Jail, Danapur. The Test
Identification Parade was conducted
also stated his participatiion in the test identification parade and
proved the signature on test identification chart, marked as Exhibit 8.
This witness has also ... test
identification parade, has not been examined to prove the test
identification chart or conduct of test identification parade. However,
test identification chart has been
shown to PW3, refusal to participate in test
identification parade by accused is justified and this test identification
parade cannot be used against the accused ... appellant in the test identification parade, (test
identification being refused) yet she said that she had identified him in test
identification parade. The first case
Prakash, who had participated in
the Test Identification Parade of the looted articles, has
identified one Gold chain and one silver coin, one side ... Learned counsel for the appellants argue that
as the articles, which were put on test identification parade,
had not been kept in sealed
