Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 7841 (0.10 seconds)

C. Muniappan & Ors vs State Of Tamil Nadu on 30 August, 2010

been shown by the Investigating Officer prior to Test Identification Parade, holding an identification parade in such facts and circumstances remains inconsequential. (vide Shaikh Umar ... before the Test Identification Parade, the identification itself looses its purpose. If the suspect is available for identification or for video identification, the photograph should
Supreme Court of India Cites 81 - Cited by 633 - B S Chauhan - Full Document

Vijay @ Chinee vs State Of M.P on 27 July, 2010

production of the report of the Radiological test and not holding the Test Identification Parade would not discredit the investigation or the prosecution case ... that the substantive evidence is the evidence of identification in court and the test identification parade provides corroboration to the identification of the witness
Supreme Court of India Cites 34 - Cited by 674 - B S Chauhan - Full Document

State Of Maharashtra vs Suresh on 10 December, 1999

dead body as that of the same girl. In a test identification parade conducted by PW-26 Magistrate he identified the respondent as the person ... parade is treated as vitiated every test identification parade would become unusable. We remind ourselves that identification parades are not primarily meant for the court
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 594 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next