Additional Junior Civil Judge,
Gurazala, who conducted Test Identification Parade on
28.12.2011, whereas, the appellants were arrested on
26.11.2011 almost after one month ... appellants/A-1 to A-5 were shown prior to Test
Identification Parade. Thus there is no evidentiary value of
the Test Identification
Additional Junior Civil Judge,
Gurazala, who conducted Test Identification Parade on
28.12.2011, whereas, the appellants were arrested on
26.11.2011 almost after one month ... Parade. Thus there is no evidentiary value of
the Test Identification Parade conducted by PW.9 in the
present case. He further
well-settled by now. The
evidence on identification of an accused in Test Identification
Parade is used to corroborate identification ... weak character unless corroborated by his
previous identification in Test Identification Parade or with any
other evidence. In absence of any corroborative
obtained
permission of this court to conduct Test Identification Parade. On
19 S.C.No.214/2016
17.5.2011 Test Identification Parade ... Venkatesha, the then Thahsildhar, Bengaluru
North Taluk deposed about conducting Test Identification Parade
of accused
obtained
permission of this court to conduct Test Identification Parade. On
17.5.2011 Test Identification Parade was conducted to identify
accused Willium ... Venkatesha, the then Thahsildhar, Bengaluru
North Taluk deposed about conducting Test Identification Parade
of accused
vitiates dock
identification:
This Court's finding:
As regards the non-conduct of test identification parade, the facts of
this ... accused is sufficient
for dock identification. Further, be it noted that non-conduct of test
identification parade will not vitiate dock identification
added to the first
information report. In the course of test identification parade the appellants were
identified by various witnesses. In conclusion ... most of the appellants in the course of the first test
identification parade and their identification in Court also suffers from various
been identified in the dock, was not put
on Test Identification Parade in his presence.
9. From his evidence, it becomes very clear ... admitted of having identified the
appellant/Jaglal Nut in the Test Identification Parade. In the
dock, though he identified the appellants
been identified in the dock, was not put
on Test Identification Parade in his presence.
9. From his evidence, it becomes very clear ... admitted of having identified the
appellant/Jaglal Nut in the Test Identification Parade. In the
dock, though he identified the appellants
accused persons pleaded not guilty and claimed trial.
Test identification parade proceeding of accused Rajjuddin was
conducted. However, he refused to participate ... Court and thereafter, complainant is asked to identify them
in test identification parade conducted before Metropolitan
Magistrate. However, no such steps were taken
