date of alleged offences. Therefore, the conduct of test
identification parade of accused persons is quiet essential. Investigating
Officer has not conducted test ... identification of
those persons after more than one month in the police station is not
possible. Under such circumstances, the test identification parade
Visakhapatnam, for
comparison through SDPO, Anakapalle. P.W.12 conducted Test Identification
Parade of the accused ... both the accused were shown to
him prior to the Test Identification Parade and that they were brought to his
shop and that
discovered and the crime.
14. Insofar as the Test Identification Parade is concerned, it is a well
settled law that Test Identification ... make the identification of the accused
by the witness before the Court trustworthy. However, the absence of Test
Identification Parade
substantive evidence is the evidence of
identification in court and the test identification parade provides
corroboration to the identification ... attached to the evidence of identification
in court, which is not preceded by a test identification parade, is a
matter
State Vs. Vikram
test identification parade is
conducted with a view to
strengthening the trustworthiness of
the evidence. Such a TIP then
provides ... claims to identify
the accused persons otherwise
unknown to him. Test Identification
parades, therefore, remain in the
realm of investigation. The Code
accused persons pleaded not guilty and claimed trial.
Test identification parade proceeding of accused Rajjuddin was
conducted. However, he refused to participate ... Court and thereafter, complainant is asked to identify them
in test identification parade conducted before Metropolitan
Magistrate. However, no such steps were taken
Kalu Ram, and possibly by some others, at a test identification parade in order to prove the identity of the petitioner as being ... Yadav and Rajni Kant were put up at the test identification parades for being identified by Kalu Ram, and he correctly identified them
Pradeep Naik is the
Magistrate, who conducted Test Identification Parade. PW.11-
K.Venkatachary is a gold smith and a circumstantial witness ... appellant/accused. Therefore, identification of
MO.2 and MO.3 by PW.1 during the course of property identification
parade conducted
which had been shown to the witnesses
before conducting the Test Identification Parade. He had not
resided at Mangalore lodge after December ... version that he had identified the appellant during
Test Identification Parade.
6. PW3 Muraleekrishna is the son of the deceased couple
prosecution that on 24.11.2021, Ms.
Karuna, Ld. MM conducted Test Identification Parade of the
accused and therein, accused was correctly identified ... which raises
reasonable doubt on their credibility. No doubt, the test
identification parade is not a substantive piece of evidence
