test identification parade on the
basis of photos.
14. Under such circumstances, when there is no
identification parade arranged ... There was no seizure from the appellant of the robbed
property. Test identification parade is doubtful. No test
identification parade
produced in
the court. Later on steps were taken for Test Identification Parade of
the accused persons. Accused refused to join Test Identification
Parade proceeding. Recovered case property was identified by
complainant/injured in the organized Test Identification Parade.
Injuries of injured was opined
were produced in muffled face
before the concerned Court for test identification parade, which was fixed
for January 3, 2008. However, accused persons ... that complainant Preet Pal Singh had
identified the case property during test identification parade. The stolen
mobile phone make Nokia 2600 having IMEI
their instance. The recovered
case property were got identified by the complainant and witnesses in Test
Identification Parade. Investigation was concluded ... that the property recovered in this
case belonged to them .In fact, the property was identified in a Test
Identification Parade
complainant in all the FIRs and not even test
identification parade had been got conducted in any of those cases. She
has further ... when the case property is recovered from a
person, the investigating agency normally does not go for test
identification parade and puts forward
witnesses in the
police station before the conduction of the test identification
parade and therefore, test identification parade has no
evidentiary ... present case, the appellant Deva was
identified in the test identification parade vide memo
identification of an accused in court by a witness is
substantive evidence whereas that of identification in test identification
parade ... identification for the first time in court, without the same being
corroborated by previous identification in the test identification parade
already given the
trace of the robbed property in other cases. A test
identification parade was arranged. The victims Onkardatt ... that identification parade inspires no
confidence. It is nothing but, a mockery of the identification
parade. Under such circumstances, identification
property was seized from the appellants or any
robbed property was found with the appellants.
11. So far as the test identification parade ... therefore, it is not a legal identification parade in
the eye of law therefore, identification parade done against
the appellants
appellant
No.1 Allu @ Kashi Prasad. On 1.7.1997, a test identification
parade was arranged in which the victim identified the
appellant ... robbed property alleged to be seized from the
appellants was not duly identified by the victim. Similarly, test
identification parade was arranged much
