basis of
such identification.
11. What would be the impact of subsequent
identification in the identification parade or in the
Court ... character, unless it
is corroborated by his previous identification in
the test identification parade or any other
evidence. The purpose of test
Additional Junior Civil Judge,
Gurazala, who conducted Test Identification Parade on
28.12.2011, whereas, the appellants were arrested on
26.11.2011 almost after one month ... appellants/A-1 to A-5 were shown prior to Test
Identification Parade. Thus there is no evidentiary value of
the Test Identification
against the appellants, though he was identified in the test
identification parade and memo Ex.P-46 was prepared. But the
victim Krishna ... appellant was shown
to him prior to arrangement of test identification parade. It is
alleged that some diesel was recovered from the appellant
Additional Junior Civil Judge,
Gurazala, who conducted Test Identification Parade on
28.12.2011, whereas, the appellants were arrested on
26.11.2011 almost after one month ... Parade. Thus there is no evidentiary value of
the Test Identification Parade conducted by PW.9 in the
present case. He further
identification of an accused by a witness in court
is substantive evidence whereas evidence of identification in
test identification parade ... character, unless it is corroborated by his previous
Identification in the test identification parade or any other
evidence. The previous identification
evidence. Though want of evidence of earlier identification
in a test identification parade does not affect the admissibility
of the evidence ... character, unless it is corroborated by his
previous identification in the test identification
parade or any other evidence. The purpose of test
prosecution would have taken
step to put him on Test Identification Parade for his
identification. He submits that since there was nothing ... Kudra Police Station, who
was subsequently identified by him in Test Identification
Parade, who was the person, whom he had seen talking with
prosecution would have taken
step to put him on Test Identification Parade for his
identification. He submits that since there was nothing ... Kudra Police Station, who
was subsequently identified by him in Test Identification
Parade, who was the person, whom he had seen talking with
Judicial Magistrate to depute a Magistrate for conducting test
identification parade. Accordingly, on 20.12.1996, P.W.13, the then
Judicial Magistrate ... proved the case beyond reasonable doubt.
Even the test identification parade is only an evidence to arrive at the
conclusion. Even
identification for the
first time made in court without the same being corroborated by
previous identification in the Test Identification Parade ... identification of an accused by a
witness in court is substantive evidence whereas evidence of
identification in Test Identification Parade
