Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 48 (2.12 seconds)

State vs Vinod@Pandit on 31 May, 2013

Juvenile Justice Board or the Committee need to go for medical test for age determination. 17. In the aforesaid background of the legal position ... present case. The respondent herein is accused in a murder case facing charges under Sections302 / 397 / 34 IPC. He claims himself to be a Juvenile
Delhi High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 1 - K Gambhir - Full Document

Rahul Jain @ Sonu vs The State (Govt. Of Nct), Delhi on 2 April, 2014

moved application for holding Test Identification Proceedings. The accused and his associates declined to participate in the Test Identification Proceedings. Statements of the witnesses conversant ... brought to trial. The prosecution examined ten witnesses to substantiate the charges. In 313 statement, the appellant pleaded false implication and denied his complicity
Delhi High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - S P Garg - Full Document

The State vs . Faisal on 21 February, 2023

find that accused did not lead any defence evidence. In response to charges framed against him, he raised the defence of innocence. In response ... conduct of his brother. 47. The above explanation was not put to test, by way of suggestions, when prosecution witnesses were examined. No evidence
Delhi District Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Salman @ Shainu on 3 June, 2019

assailants and complainant also identified the accused during judicial Test Identification Parade proceedings, which stood also admitted by the accused. He also submitted that rather ... Addl. PP prayed for conviction to the accused, as per the charges framed against him. 11. Per contra, learned defence counsel submitted that prosecution case
Delhi District Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 Next