from APSEB, (2) supervision, erection and
commissioning charges, and (3) testing charges received by the
respondent-assessee during the assessment year 1991-92, and
thus
exceeded the contracted load from 99 HP to 104.91HP, hence
Development charges case was booked for an amount of
Rs.15,620/- for regularization ... which was collected
from the consumer towards testing charges within 21 days, and if
3
the complainant is aggrieved by the said order, may avail
exceeded the contracted load from 99 HP to 104.91HP, hence
Development charges case was booked for an amount of
Rs.15,620/- for regularization ... which was collected
from the consumer towards testing charges within 21 days, and if
3
the complainant is aggrieved by the said order, may avail
towards medicines and treatment; Rs.6,719/-
towards O.P. charges, Lab Tests etc. and Rs.1,00,000/- towards
future medical expenses. Considering
The Govt Of Ap., Home Dept., 2 Others vs M.Vishwanatham Another on 8 June
Prl Secy, Home Dept, Hyderabad 3 Others vs K. Bala Krishna, Khammam District ... on 8
examined Exs.1 to 7 issued report on 06.05.2010, affirming
positive tests for the presence of Phenolphthalein, Sodium and
Carbonate Ions ... conclude that, there is prima facie material against this petitioner
to frame charges.
MSM,J
CrlRC_1606_2013
6
Upon hearing arguments of both
Addl.Director Gen.Of Police,Hyd, 3 vs Guguloth Balya,Wrn Dist,Anot on 8
The Government Of Telangana, vs O.Srinivas, on 8 June, 2018
Author: Sanjay Kumar
Bench
Prl Secy, Home Dept, Hyderabad 2 Others vs Abdul Afroz Khan, Nizamabad District ... on 8
