Shri Balasaheb K. Thackeray & Anr vs Shri Venkat @ Babru S/O Wamanrao ... on 5 July, 2006
Equivalent citations: AIRONLINE 2006 SC 316
Author: Arijit ... Thakker
CASE NO.:
Appeal (crl.) 236 of 2006
PETITIONER:
Shri Balasaheb K. Thackeray & Anr.
RESPONDENT:
Shri Venkat @ Babru S/o Wamanrao Deshpande Charthankar
Thackery. The Muncipal Members as well as the son of Bal Thackeray did not come there. Thereafter, A-2 asked the driver Tambe on take
Court had occasion to consider Sections 256 and
302 in Balasaheb K. Thackeray & Anr. Vs. Venkat @ Babru ,
(2006) 5 SCC 530. In the above
Thackery. The Municipal Members
as well as the son of Bal Thackeray did not come there. Thereafter,
A-2 asked the driver Tambe to take
requires is the removal of the
bar.............."
In Shri Balasaheb K. Thackeray & Anr. Vs. Shri Venkat @
Babru S/O. Wamanrao Deshpande Charthankar ... Section 302 of the Code.
Reference was also made to Balasaheb K.
Thackeray & Anr. v. Venkat @ Babru &
Another
Court had occasion to consider Sections 256 and
302 in Balasaheb K. Thackeray & Anr. v. Venkat @
Babru , 2006(3) RCR (Criminal
Court had occasion to consider Sections 256 and
302 in Balasaheb K. Thackeray & Anr. Vs. Venkat @ Babru ,
(2006) 5 SCC 530. In the above
occasion to consider Sections 256 and 302 in
Balasaheb K. Thackeray v. Venkat . In the above case complaint was filed
under Section 500 read with
Shaikh Saheblal
Mardan reported in (2007) 2 SCC 548.
2. Balasaheb Thackeray and Anr. vs. Venkat reported in
(2006) 5 SCC 530.
4. Considering
view of the Judgment in Balasaheb K. Thackeray &
Anr. vs. Venkat alias Babru & Anr. (2006) 5 SCC 530, the
Legal representatives
