courts.
Supreme Court in the case of Shri Balasaheb K.
Thackeray & Anr vs Shri Venkat @ Babru S/O Wamanrao,
reported ... ratio of law laid in the case of Shri Balasaheb K. Thackeray
(supra), as under:-
"7. There is no dispute regarding facts and events
learned Appellate Court and also reliance was placed upon Shri Balasaheb K
Thackeray & Anr. v. Shri Venkat @ Babru son of Wamanrao,
Manu/SC/8218 ... providing for permission to conduct prosecution, as well as Shri
Balasaheb K. Thackeray v. Shri Venkat @ Babru (supra), to hold that the
High Court
Reported in (2018) 1 SCC 71 and Balasaheb K. Thackeray & Anr. -vs-
Venkat alias Babru, S/o Wamanrao reported ... occasion to consider Sections 256 and
302 in Balasaheb K. Thackeray v. Venkat [Balasaheb K.
Thackeray v. Venkat
This view has been followed in the case of BALASAHEB K.
THACKERAY AND ANOTHER v. VENKAT ALIAS BABRU AND
17
ANOTHER
three options available, there is no impropriety or illegality, In Balasaheb K. Thackeray v. Venkat 2006(3) KLT 509 SC the Supreme Court held that
Tripuraneni Sai Prasad v.
State of A.P. and another , Balasaheb K. Thackeray and
another v. Venkat Alias Babru and another , Gadala Vasantha
(died ... could be continued by the son of the deceased.
In Balasaheb K. Thackeray (7 supra), the Apex Court held
as under:
At this juncture
Tripuraneni Sai Prasad v.
State of A.P. and another , Balasaheb K. Thackeray and
another v. Venkat Alias Babru and another , Gadala Vasantha
(died ... could be continued by the son of the deceased.
In Balasaheb K. Thackeray (7 supra), the Apex Court held
as under:
At this juncture
complainant. Similar arguments were advanced in the case of Balasaheb
K. Thackeray and Another Vs. Venkat @ Bablu and Another , (2006) 5 SCC
530 (paragraph ... accepted.
What the Court held in the case of Balasaheb K. Thackeray (supra) was that
"to bring an application of Section
Code of
Criminal Procedure, note of the decision in Balasaheb K. Thackeray and
Anr. v. Venkat @ Babru , reported in (2006) 5 SCC 530 was taken
Code of
Criminal Procedure, note of the decision in Balasaheb K. Thackeray and
Anr. v. Venkat @ Babru , reported in (2006) 5 SCC 530 was taken
