Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 882 (2.46 seconds)

Sh. Dil Sukh (Since Deceased) vs State on 8 May, 2023

alleged Will by taking her thumb impression. It is further contended that the thumb impression of the testatrix was obtained, managed and manipulated by fraud ... deposed that on 10.05.2011 their thumb impressions were not taken and only the thumb impressions of the Testatrix were taken before the sub-registrar. -Additionally
Delhi District Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

D.Vijayalakshmi vs E.Vedagiri

testatrix. 7.Under the Will dated 10.04.1994, the two attesting witnesses are 1) Mahadevan and 2) Balasundaram. The testatrix Kuppammal has left her thumb impression ... dated 10.04.1994, the testatrix has affixed her left thumb impression instead of affixing right thumb impression which is the normal practice. i)The various versions
Madras High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - R Shakdher - Full Document

Anita And Ors vs State And Ors on 21 March, 2025

question. The testatrix was his maternal grandmother. In his affidavit, he deposed that at first the testatrix put her thumb impression in his presence ... clear from this certification that the mentioning of left thumb impression is regarding thumb impression on the Will itself or on some official Register used
Delhi District Court Cites 36 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next