Alhate, City Magistrate at Nashik as PW25. He had
conducted the TI parade of accused nos. 1 to 5 on 25.07.2003.
Through his evidence ... parade. It is submitted that on the contrary he
admits that the parade was held in an open space. It is submitted
that TI parade
came to be arrested on 7/10/2004 and his TI parade was held on 9/10/2004. Both ... City Magistrate at Nashik as PW 25. He had conducted the TI parade of accused Nos. 1 to 5 on 25/7/2003. Through
complainant as the property stolen from her house. TI parade was held in Bombay Central Prison on 5/2/1996. In the TI parade ... incident. The other witnesses are the officer who held the TI parade and the panchas to the spot panchanama and recovery panchanamas. Two doctors have
Chaudhuri. On
the basis of the prayer of the investigating officer, TI Parade was held. The
father and the wife of the deceased identified ... next day. He also identified the accused/convict
in the TI Parade. He stated further in his cross-examination that
Samudragarh is a big village
previous acquaintance with the accused. Yet, there was no
Test Identification Parade (TI Parade) conducted during the investigation
to confirm identity of the assailant ... identification of the assailant by PW2 in the absence of a TI Parade.
36. In cross-examination
explain as to how they zeroed on these other accused. The TI parade held on 15/3/2001 and conducted by the Tahsildar ... vitiating the identifications of the accused and the report of the TI parade was not available. The complainant (PW 38) being a well known doctor
Afzal @ Sarju and Md. Rafique @ Chachu were identified at the TI parade. Hence, all the above five accused persons were charged under sections ... accused persons were identified to the witnesses at Lalbazar before the TI parade. They are innocent.
5. 29 witnesses were examined on behalf
also identified the accused Samir, Raghunath, Jhantu in course of TI Parade inside the jail on 3-5-90. She also identified the accused Santu ... TI Parade held on 8-6-90 inside the jail. It also appears that the PW 1 duly identified the accused Samir, Raghunath, and Santu
indentified
the appellant and other accused persons during TI Parade proceeding. PW-2 while adducing evidence in court and during
trial has stated on oath ... evidence of PW-
24 that the learned Magistrate, who conducted the TI Parade on April 19, 2000 an order was passed for holding the TI
concerned, she had identified the accused in Test Identification parade ("TI parade" for short) held on 26th July 1996 which was after about ... Court. She stated that she had identified him in TI parade also. As far as this testimony is concerned, also there is nothing to disturb
