arrest of the appellant, he was placed in
2
the TI Parade and allegedly identified and a copy of the recovery
memo was not exhibited ... only witness, who
identified him in the TI Parade and in the court. He lastly submits
that 313 was not conducted by the learned Judge
arrest of the appellant, he was placed in
2
the TI Parade and allegedly identified and a copy of the recovery
memo was not exhibited ... only witness, who
identified him in the TI Parade and in the court. He lastly submits
that 313 was not conducted by the learned Judge
arrest of the appellant, he was placed in
2
the TI Parade and allegedly identified and a copy of the recovery
memo was not exhibited ... only witness, who
identified him in the TI Parade and in the court. He lastly submits
that 313 was not conducted by the learned Judge
arrest of the appellant, he was placed in
2
the TI Parade and allegedly identified and a copy of the recovery
memo was not exhibited ... only witness, who
identified him in the TI Parade and in the court. He lastly submits
that 313 was not conducted by the learned Judge
Gopal Kishan Sinha, a Judicial Magistrate, held the TI
Parade and PW/16, Anirban Roy, another Judicial Magistrate, recorded the
statements of PW/6, Ramjana ... contended that the
appellant, Khudiram Biswas was never placed in TI parade for his
identification by the PW/3, who was an employee
that the petitioner nos.2 and 3 were not placed in TI
Parade, although the police had sufficient opportunity to do the same. He further ... that the petitioner nos.2 and 3 were not placed in TI Parade, while the petitioner
no.1 was. He also added that from
noted that all the accused persons were identified in TI Parade.
Going further through the 164 statement of the victim, we find that there
available. He
3
points out that the petitioner was identified in TI Parade both by the
injured witness and the eyewitnesses to the occurrence
actually committed the crime
and he has been identified in TI Parade and the stolen articles were
recovered from his possession. TI Parade sheet
dacoity committed in a factory. The petitioner has been
identified in TI Parade by the victim. Pursuant to his statement and on being