Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

grave defect or that it does not prejudicially affect the accused when they have been convicted for al tile three offences by the application

introduction of a new ground and consequently it set aside tile order of the Tribunal and directed a retrial of the issue involving. The appellant ... nomination for the nomination paper ex facie did not disclose any defect or disqualification. There being no subsisting prayer seeking to raise the ground under

Their Lordships observed: The omission to frame a charge is a grave defect and should be vigilantly guarded against. In some cases ... sanction prescribed as a condition precedent for a prosecution, in short defects that strike at the very root of jurisdiction stand on a separate footing

Tahsildar Singh And Another vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh on 5 May, 1959 Equivalent

All India Reporter Ltd. And Anr. vs Ramchandra Dhondo Datar on 30 September, 1959 Equivalent

Jai Kishan Srivastava vs Income-Tax Officer, Kanpur And Anr. on 15 May, 1959 Equivalent

which an Inspector visiting the Establishment may record his remarks regarding any defects that may come to light at the time of his inspection ... walls or tops of rooms which are made of galvanised iron-sheets, tiles, asbestos sheets or similar material or glazed bricks; (iii) ceiling of rooms

The Workers And Staff Employed Under The ... vs The Management Of The Express ... on 13

S.M. Nawab Ariff vs Corporation Of Calcutta And Ors. on 12 August, 1959 Equivalent

natural justice and should not be accepted as correct, and that this defect was sufficient to invalidate the order passed by the Tribunal. 6. This ... brought to our notice in this connection that the Vakalatnama which was tiled by Shri L. L. Sharma in the appeal before the Appellate Tribunal