Monu Timbers vs State Of Kerala on 28 November, 2011
Author: K.Vinod Chandran
Bench: Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan , K.Vinod Chandran
IN THE HIGH COURT ... ERNAKULAM].
(ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-09)
------------------
REVISION PETITIONER:-
-----------------------------------
M/S.U.K.MONU TIMBERS,
KOTTACHERRY,
KANHANGAD,
KASARAGOD DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENON
SMT.MEERA
part) in the revised development of Pune City for the timber industry is for the public purpose.
(ii) Whether the designation of the aforesaid land ... timber industry in the revised development plan of Pune City notified on 5.1.1987 has lapsed under section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional Town Planning
Associated Timber Industries And Ors vs Central Bank Of India And Anr on 9 August, 2000
Equivalent citations: AIR 2000 SUPREME COURT ... Shivraj V. Patil
CASE NO.:
Appeal (civil) 4446 of 2000
PETITIONER:
ASSOCIATED TIMBER INDUSTRIES AND ORS.
RESPONDENT:
CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA AND ANR.
DATE
Forests and trees in
Jagir--If vest in State.
Contract to cut timber--If sate of ascertained
goods-- Sale of Goods ... estate in the State. and the appellant was prohibited
from cutting timber in exercise of his rights under the
contract. After some negotiations, a letter
Government.
The Corporation took a decision for the extraction of
timber of a total volume of 10.08 lakh c. ft. which included
the work ... been taken not to work the area further till
the entire timber already extracted was removed to its
destination. There was, therefore, no question
petitioners in addition to
the tendu leaves other forest produce like timber, bamboos,
etc., the soil for making bricks, and the right to build ... produce in the shape
of
340
tendu leaves, or lac, or timber or wood, (4) that the
agreements granted no 'interest in land
requirements,
the company claims to purchase substantial and huge quantity
of wood/ timber from registered dealers having valid
licences and the same is used ... under
the Act in question or the Forest Act for transport of
timber purchased by them, their claim throughout being that
they are not carrying
Tirumala Venkateswara Timber ... vs Commercial Tax Officer, Rajahmundry on 28 November, 1967
Equivalent citations: 1968 AIR 784, 1968 SCR (2) 476, AIR 1968 SUPREME COURT ... Ramaswami
Bench: V. Ramaswami , J.C. Shah , Vishishtha Bhargava
PETITIONER:
TIRUMALA VENKATESWARA TIMBER ANDBAMBOO FIRM
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, RAJAHMUNDRY
DATE OF JUDGMENT
levy of transit fee under Rule 5 of U.P. Transit of Timber and Other Forest Produce Rules, 1978 (for short 'the Rules ... Rule 5. Rule 14 provides for affixing of transit marks to timber. Rules 3, 5 and 14 read as under:
"3. Regulation of transit
Electricity Board, Jabalpur vs M/S. Vijaya Timber Co on 5 December, 1996
Equivalent citations: AIR 1997 SUPREME COURT ... Venkataswami
PETITIONER:
M.P. ELECTRICITY BOARD, JABALPUR.
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
M/S. VIJAYA TIMBER CO.
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/12/1996
BENCH:
M.M. PUNCHHI
