certain time limit is fixed in an agreement to sell, one cannot
jump to the conclusion that time is the essence of the contract relating ... above such prescription of time limit, there
should be other proven circumstances to countenance that time is the essence of
Contract.
48. The learned Counsel
intended to bite for the time, which disentitles them as time is the essence of the contract. Continuous readiness and willingness at all stages from ... transaction should be completed. The said time-limit may not amount to making time the essence of the contract but it must yet have some
contract throughout? or Whether they committed default?
(ii) Whether time was essence of the contract?
(iii) Whether there is any infirmity in the judgement ... intended to bite for the time, which disentitles them as time is the essence of the contract. Continuous readiness and willingness at all stages from
time being the essence of the contract. Even if it is not of the essence of the contract, the Court may infer that ... transaction should be completed. The said time-limit may not amount to making time the essence of the contract but it must yet have some
time being the essence of the contract. Even if it is not of the essence of the contract, the Court may infer that ... transaction should be completed. The said time-limit may not amount to making time the essence of the contract but it must yet have some
time being the essence of the contract. Even if it is not of the essence of the contract, the Court may infer that ... transaction should be completed. The said time-limit may not amount to making time the essence of the contract but it must yet have some
months' period as the time for performance, apparently indicating that the time was the essence of the contract. Under the said agreement to sell ... intended to bite for the time, which disentitles them as time is the essence of the contract. Continuous readiness and willingness at all stages from
consideration the distinction between, the two principles, viz., (i) time is not the essence of contract relating to immovable property; and (ii) the limitation period ... Contract Act, 1872 provides that every promise may extend time for the performance of the contract. Such an agreement to extend time need not necessarily
doubt, the aforesaid decisions would highlight that time was not
essence of the contract and the cited decision is not applicable in the facts ... time had to be
extended ad infinitum.
64. Here, the question involved is not that the time is the essence of
contract
question whether time is not of the essence of the contract in contracts relating to immovable property, is given by this court ... have held on facts in this case that time is the essence of the contract, even with reference to the principles in Chand Rani
