that the testimony of PW-2 also established that
even before the TIP could be conducted; the appellants had been shown to the witness. This ... reason why TIP was refused. Having first seen the accused/appellant in police custody, the
witness (PW-2) had no difficulty in later identifying them
appellant. The learned counsel very strenuously canvasses that no test
identification proceedings (TIP) were got conducted to get the
appellant identified by either PW16 ... previously acquainted with the appellant and in the absence
of previous TIP, it would be highly unsafe to rely on the testimonies
2005. During investigation,
both the accused were sought to be put to TIP on
13.01.2005, but they refused to participate stating that they
have been ... namely the briefcase was however got identified by the
complainant in the TIP proceedings held on 14.01.2005.
11. In the meanwhile, co-accused Ajay Kumar
application was moved by the I.O. (PW-24) for holding a TIP in respect
of Appellants Miraj @ Jakir and Asif @ Naeem. They, however, declined ... join the TIP. Appellant Miraj @ Jakir led the police party to a place
near Shahdara flyover on Loni, Ghaziabad road and produced a shirt
having
three
accused Brij Babu, Hemant and Ishwar, in the Test Identification Parade
(TIP) conducted on 13th October, 2008 and Sonu in the TIP conducted ... appellants were shown
to him, in the police station, before the TIP was conducted and hence the
TIP proceedings were vitiated. The recoveries made pursuant
concerned court on the same day for holding of Test Identification Parade (TIP) in respect of the appellant in view of the suspicion expressed ... went to Central Jail, Tihar to identify the accused in TIP but there he was informed by the IO(investigating officer) that the accused
were recovered from his house at Village Budhpur, District
Baghpat. During the TIP the Appellant and Sandeep was duly identified by
Ms. Navneet Kaur ... whereas the other Appellants refused to participate in
the TIP. After the charge sheet, trial was conducted and the Appellants were
convicted and sentenced
manufactured and sold by the appellants, were needles having a black tip on
a wooden body; if a needle had a head or connector attached ... would have to be black in colour. In other words, the black tipped and/or
black headed needles were agreed to be the distinctive
duly identified the appellant in
the Test Identification Parade (TIP) conducted on
27.11.2009 in Rongyek State Jail. The TIP report is
Exbt.18.
2.5 Dhurba ... station and he also admitted that when the Judicial
Magistrate, during the TIP, put the question to him that when
he saw the appellant last
arrested in this case on 29.06.1996. A judicial Test
Identification Parade (TIP) arranged during investigation was refused by him (Ram
Sewak). On the basis ... Appellant was arrested on 12.07.1996. He too refused to join the TIP
proceedings. He made a disclosure statement Ex.PW-22/B. In pursuance
