refused to join the TIP and accused Deva and Rattan were put to join the TIP
proceedings , but they also refused to join the same ... police that both these boys had refused to join the TIP. TIP was
refused by accused Praveen
Anil @ Kala and recorded his disclosure
statement. He deposed that accused refused TIP. He further deposed that on
19.09.1997 he formally arrested accused Vinu ... bail orders in his favour. He deposed that accused Vinu also refused TIP
proceedings.
Formal Witnesses.
5.12) PW7 ASI Rattan Pal deposed that
appellants Nadim, Fareed, Mehfooz and Usman refused to join
TIP during the course of investigation. All the appellants were charged under
Section ... Officer to show him to the aforesaid
witnesses.
If the accused refuses TIP without any justifiable cause, he does at his
own peril
application was made for their Test Identification Parade (for
short „TIP‟). They, however, refused to join the TIP.
This is also the case ... Kumar is the Judicial Officer before whom,
the appellant Dharmender refused to join TIP on 28.4.2008 on the
ground that his photographs were taken
which the appellant convict stated that he had
17
refused for the TIP as he was already shown to the
witnesses by the police ... case may be, however, on such ground alone
he cannot refuse to face the TIP. It is always open for the
accused to raise
present
case; appellant Med Singh stated that he had refused TIP for the
reason that his photographs had been taken in the Police Station ... made on 9.1.2002. TIP
proceedings had been held before the court of PW-18 on
19.1.2002. TIP had been refused on the ground that
been given the statutory warning that his statement of refusal to TIP
shall be used as a piece of evidence against him. Even despite ... holding the TIP. The appellant was arrested on
26.12.2010. An application for holding TIP was made on 3.1.2011. The
appellant had however refused to participate
said accused, who was produced for TIP, refused to take part in the
TIP proceedings, however, PW-1 correctly identified the said
accused person ... said accused, who was produced for TIP, refused
to take part in the TIP proceedings. It is further in
evidence that PW-1 correctly identified
participated in TIP proceedings whose TIP proceedings are Ex.PW33/B.
The TIP proceedings of accused no. 4 Shyam @ Chhotu ... dated 24.02.2011 and he has also refused TIP on the ground that his
photographs were taken at PS and he has shown to many witness
Jitender @ Guddu Passi was
produced before him in muffled face for TIP. Accused refused
to join the TIP. Accused was warned that an adverse
inference ... TIP proceedings because complainant
knew him being neighbour. He proved the TIP proceedings
as Ex.PW17/B.
48. He conducted the TIP of accused
