involved, TIP of only two accused was got
conducted. The appellant refused TIP proceedings, for the reason, he was
shown to the witnesses ... after Gaurav Chadha was identified in TIP
proceedings and Kunal Bhandari refused TIP that they were again produced
and their police custody remand was sought
court and formally arrested in
the present case. He also refused for TIP proceedings. Further
investigation was carried out. Statement of witnesses were recorded ... TIP as the complainant has already seen him
during robbery. Ex.A2 is TIP of accused Amber Jafri as per which
he has refused
this regard. She identified
the appellants in the Court after they refused TIP, when she came to know
about their names. According to her, Sheikh ... jail in TIP before the learned MM. However as the
accused refused, no TIP was conducted.
14. As regards the other accused i.e. Nasiruddin
present case. It
is also submitted that the petitioner even refused TIP.
7.0 Vide his application, the petitioner has submitted that he has been
falsely
With respect to appellant Ajay, it was contended that he refused
TIP on 21st February, 2012 (Ex.PW31/C), but on 23rd February ... CrPC
admitted his arrest from Surat, Gujarat. Further, he also refused
TIP on 6th February, 2013 without any reason as reflected
investigation was carried
out by SI Satish Kumar. He refused TIP and the knife which was used
in the commission of the offence could
victim
in the police station and thereby legitimizing his refusal for the TIP. It
has been held in series of judgments inter alia Mohd. Anwar ... that an adverse inference
ought to be drawn for refusal of TIP without any justification. The
appellant, therefore, was duly identified
Vishal Balguer, Vikas Balguer and Vikas @ Shammi were also arrested,
who refused TIP. The CCTV footage of the incident was also collected.
4. Learned counsel
friend Amit on 10.06.2021.
5. The applicant/petitioner also refused to join TIP proceedings on
16.06.2021. The complainant further identified the petitioner after seeing ... petitioner is duly linked as per CDR record and even refused TIP
proceedings. Merely because of delay in recording the FIR, it cannot be
assumed
recovered at the instance of
Prateek Kataria. All the accused refused TIP proceedings.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner
