refused to join the TIP and accused Deva and Rattan were put to join the TIP
proceedings , but they also refused to join the same ... police that both these boys had refused to join the TIP. TIP was
refused by accused Praveen
appellants Nadim, Fareed, Mehfooz and Usman refused to join
TIP during the course of investigation. All the appellants were charged under
Section ... Officer to show him to the aforesaid
witnesses.
If the accused refuses TIP without any justifiable cause, he does at his
own peril
application was made for their Test Identification Parade (for
short „TIP‟). They, however, refused to join the TIP.
This is also the case ... Kumar is the Judicial Officer before whom,
the appellant Dharmender refused to join TIP on 28.4.2008 on the
ground that his photographs were taken
present
case; appellant Med Singh stated that he had refused TIP for the
reason that his photographs had been taken in the Police Station ... made on 9.1.2002. TIP
proceedings had been held before the court of PW-18 on
19.1.2002. TIP had been refused on the ground that
been given the statutory warning that his statement of refusal to TIP
shall be used as a piece of evidence against him. Even despite ... holding the TIP. The appellant was arrested on
26.12.2010. An application for holding TIP was made on 3.1.2011. The
appellant had however refused to participate
thereafter re-fixed for 17.05.2002. All the
aforenoted accused persons had refused TIP although they had been
warned that their refusal would lead to drawing ... TIP has not been held. TIP has been held but the accused persons
without any valid reasons had refused the TIP. The versions
them while
proceedings (Ex.PW-3/D) had refused TIP. The complainant had
Crl. Appeal Nos.575/2013, 1374/2013 & 1376/2014 Page ... accused; the purpose of TIP was to enable to the
victim to identify the correct accused. TIP was even otherwise refused
by the accused
version.
He further submits that all the accused persons admitted their TIP
refusal vide their statements recorded in the court on oath ... accused persons
would have gone to judicial remand, after they had refused TIP,
therefore, the only opportunity to identify was the identification in the
court
before court on 11.02.2011, thereafter he
was arrested and he also refused TIP, but other accused Langra and Ganni
could not be traced ... both the accused persons
were arrested. However, both the accused persons refused TIP and two
other accused persons are not found traceable.
Description of incident
Court Arbitration
Centre, High Court of Delhi. This witness has proved TIP refusal of accused Sunil
SC No.53/2008
State v. Dilshad @ Sonu ... connivance
with HC Rohtash and they had refused TIP proceedings as they had been shown to
witnesses at police station and I.O. had planted
