acquired the title of land by encroachment without approaching the Civil Courts of Bombay to establish its title by virtue of possession which was adverse ... title over the property held in adverse possession. Adverse possession was thus a method of acquisition of title to land. Allowing an uninterrupted possession
Modern Threads (India) Ltd. vs Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax on 30 October, 1998
Equivalent
that it could remain afloat‖. Thus, by its admission, the title and possession
of alleged goods have never been passed on to M/s Flipkart
Modern Threads (I) Ltd. vs Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax on 12 January, 1999
Equivalent
matter of fact, this section does not confer title on the defendant in possession. He cannot maintain a suit for title. In the present case ... terms of the contract. This section does not confer title on the defendant in possession and on the basis of such contract he cannot maintain
latest by 19.06.2010. Even, Possession Offer Letter dated 10.12.2015 (Annexure C-18) issued to the complainant is only a paper possession and nor more than ... applicable upon her. In a similar case relating to delayed possession, titled as Guninder Jeet Singh Salh Vs M/s Emaar MGF Land Limited
flat u/s 54 of the Act. The assessee submitted
that legal title is not necessary for claiming deduction. The AO rejected the
assesses submissions ... income and on payment thereof had been
allotted and granted title, possession and ownership rights for the said
apartment. The assessee submitted that exemption could
previous owner i.e. HUF was the right to obtain title and possession of the flat and it cannot be said that the flat itself ... owner of the flat but was owner of right to get possession and title of the flat. In view of the above, the first issue
Dhara Jagdishchandra Patel, , ... vs Cit, A'Bad-Iii,, Ahmedabad on 3 May, 2017
आयकर
Registration Act do not empower the registering authority to satisfy the title, possession or encumbrances in respect of the property with respect to which registration ... authority can raise a doubt with regard to the title and possession of the property only if the statute under which he is functioning authorises
