stated to have assured him, to torn the pronote
after going to his house. It will not be out of place to mention here that ... Lambardar and at that time, the plaintiff assured that he will
torn out the pronote and receipt. Thus, the execution of pronote and
receipt
returned and the respondent-plaintiff had assured that
he will torn the pronote and receipt. Again a sum of `50,000 was taken as
loan
revoke the will and yet the will is not found on the death of the testator it may well be that the will was misplaced ... Swaroop that Sewa Singh had deposed that the testatrix might have torn the will. According to him, she destroyed the will with a purpose
sole heir of Gauri Shanker as per the Will and even if the Will was ignored Balo Ram was the sole heir as there were ... Indian Succession Act their defence that the Will had been torn by the deceased would vitiate the stand of the defendant and the plaintiffs were
second lease deed. The above words have been torn out of context. It will be recalled that by the lease deed dated September
full authority and all his commitments will be binding upon him". These words cannot be torn from their context and be read
prosecutrix and
had torn the clothes and threw her on the cot for committing rape. Accused
had given fist blows and torn her clothes also ... Court held that where apparels worn by the victim were torn,
the offence will fall under Section 354 IPC.
In Hari Mohapatra and another
appellate jurisdiction.
35. The last passage quoted even when torn from its context will not yield, in my humble judgment, the meaning which the learned
registered Will dated 04.08.1995.
Both the Courts have held that the Will dated 04.08.1995 is not
proved whereas Will dated 28.08.1995 is proved ... evidence in order to prove the Will dated 04.08.1995 as some part of the
Will was found torn, however, this Court is of the opinion
After discussing the evidence, the Court came to
conclusion that offence will fall under Section 354 IPC.
In Ram Pratap v. State of Rajasthan ... Court held that where apparels worn by
the victim were torn, the offence will fall under Section
354 IPC.
In Hari Mohapatra and another
