State, a Statutory Body, or a public body in contractual or tortious actions. But they cannot be siphoned off into the writ jurisdiction ... acts done in performance of ordinary contracts. It was held that interference was permissible on the ground of violation of Article 14 in regard
disposal was passed by a Magistrate would not in any way interfere with or wipe away the right of the owner to demand the return ... contention that the State Government is not liable for any tortious act of its servants can possibly arise. The decisions in 1962 Supp
employment and, therefore, the driver alone is liable for the tortious act and the owner is not vicariously liable. The same view was taken ... reasoning is well supported by evidence and, therefore, it does not warrant interference in this appeal. The appeal is accordingly dismissed, but, in the circumstances
this case, though I do not find any justifying reasons to interfere with the order and award of the Tribunal so far as the appellant ... holding the respondent No. 4 was also vicariously liable for the tortious act of appellant No. 1 and, therefore, responsible for payment of the compensation
payable to the petitioner, it would mean that had there been no tortious act of the landlord the petitioner would be emitted to recover this ... been deprived of the rent from the sub-tenants by the tortious act of ihe plaintiff. So even if the proportionate rent
shown either that the minor has himself committed some of the tortious acts complained of by the plaintiffs or that there is a reasonable apprehension ... annoy the plaintiffs, and the apprehension that he is likely to interfere with their rights in the future is based solely on the fact that
deny the same. The allegation made against the defendants amounts to interference by them with the subsisting contract between the plaintiff on the one hand ... follows:
"A commits a tort if, without lawful justification, he intentionally interferes with a contract between B and C, (a) by persuading
commits a tort if without lawful justification, he intentionally interferes with the contract between 'B' & 'C, (a) by pursuading ... contract with 'C or (b) by some other act proposes only tortious in itself which prevents 'B' from performing its contract
Gujarat Beedi Karkhana Owners' ... vs Union Of India And Ors. on 15 October, 1970
borne in mind that a broad view of law relating to tortious liability has to be taken. Two aspects that arise for consideration are existence ... kept in mind that in certain countries it is regarded interference with an individual's decision to procreate a child is violating
