Five crores) to the Complainant as damages in respect
of the tortious interference with and willful actions of the Respondent to
negate the value
without taking
consent is an unauthorized invasion and interference with patient's
body amounted to tortious act of assault, battery and deficiency in
service
such surgery was an
unauthorized invasion and interference with the appellants body which amounted
to tortious act of assault and battery and, therefore, amounted
procedure was an unauthorized invasion and interference with the
complainant's body which amounted to a tortious act of assault
and battery and therefor
Shri Vipul A. Shah vs All India Film Employee Confederation & ... on 31 October, 2017
Lakshmaiah vs Man Singh & Anr. on 25 October, 2024
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
ground of vicarious liability - Appellant Bank
refusing payment of money for tortious acts of its
officials and contended that respondent complainant
had already withdrawn ... amount - All fora
below concurrently holding that appellant Bank was
respondent complaint - Interference with - Held,
concurrent findings recorded by Consumer Fora did not
suffer from
aforesaid question in a Revision Petition, wherein the scope of interference is limited only to correction of a Jurisdictional error in the orders ... establish negligence. Even assuming that the
-5-
general principle in cases of tortious liability is that the party who alleges negligence against the other must
Aryavart Foundation vs Yashyashvi Rasayan Pvt. Ltd on 3 February, 2021
Author: Adarsh Kumar Goel
Akhil Bhartiya Mangela Samaj Parishad vs Maharashtra Pollution Control Board ... on 24 January, 2022
Author
