facts are made by both the courts
below, this Court cannot interfere with such findings of facts
in the Second Appeal.
10. Therefore, as rightly ... when it is a
case of tortious liability. There is absolutely nothing to
RSA.416/2010
: 10 :
interfere with the quantification made by the lower
facts are made by both the courts
below, this Court cannot interfere with such findings of facts
in the Second Appeal.
10. Therefore, as rightly ... when it is a
case of tortious liability. There is absolutely nothing to
RSA.416/2010
: 10 :
interfere with the quantification made by the lower
legally correct and I find no reason to interfere
with the reasoning that in a tortious liability the question as to
who was the aggressor ... plaintiffs/respondents.
RSA No.1189/2017 5
I find no reason to interfere with the findings. There is no
substantial question of law arising
Tribunal has deducted one-
third, which does not warrant any interference at the hands of
M.A.C.A.2010/07 & cc - : 15 :-
this ... deducted one-third. In the above circumstances, we
are not inclined to interfere with the compensation assessed by
the Tribunal as well. Accordingly
insurer will be liable
to compensate. There is nothing to interfere with the
dismissal of the claim petition filed by the rider of the
motorbike ... sine qua non for the claimant
to prove negligence and tortious act on
the part of the primary offender, the
driver of the car. There
person to break a contract of employment or that it is in interference with the trade, business or employment of some other person or with ... other legal proceeding in any civil court in respect of any tortious act done in contemplation or furtherance of a trade dispute by an agent
officer of that authority. When the
claim is based on tortious liability imputed against the local authority
and not strictly with reference ... local authority in respect of a claim arising against it on a tortious
liability, the challenge raised with respect to the period of limitation
under
Section 166 proceedings which is an extension of the tortious
liability under the Civil law unless negligence is proved a claimant
will ... Company to pay the amount. The decision does not call
for any interference.
Therefore the appeal lacks merit and the same is dismissed
without costs
burden of proof to claim damages on account of a
tortious liability being solely on the shoulders of the
plaintiff, and the plaintiff ... this Court does not find any reason to
consider whether such appreciation interferes with
further submitted that the compensation granted under
other heads also invites no interference as the appellant
was justly compensated under all such heads ... evident that he
sustained loss of bodily integrity. Owing to the tortious
action of another when a person had to sustain loss of his
bodily
