malicious abuse of civil proceedings but it is the tort of interference with the contract or business of the plaintiff. She has relied upon ... follows:
"A commits a tort if, without lawful justification, he intentionally interferes with a contract between B and C, (a) by persuading
present case, we have a trespasser who has tortiously entered upon the land of another, and built a house thereon. Without going ... third person and erected a bungalow thereon, which B did not interfere to prevent. Couch C.J., in giving judgment, said (p. 85): "Hormasji
shown either that the minor has himself committed some of the tortious acts complained of by the plaintiffs or that there is a reasonable apprehension ... annoy the plaintiffs, and the apprehension that he is likely to interfere with their rights in the future is based solely on the fact that
disposal was passed by a Magistrate would not
in any way interfere with or wipe away the right of the owner to
demand the return ... contention that the
State Government is not liable for any tortious act of its servants can
possibly arise."
In the facts of the present
fact being in consonance with the evidence on
record does not deserve interference.
8. Though relying upon the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme ... complaints involving highly
disputed questions of fact or the cases involving tortious acts or
criminality like fraud or cheating could not have been decided
fact being in consonance with the evidence on
record does not deserve interference.
8. Though relying upon the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme ... complaints involving highly
disputed questions of fact or the cases involving tortious acts or
criminality like fraud or cheating could not have been decided
fact being in consonance with the evidence on
record does not deserve interference.
8. Though relying upon the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme ... complaints involving highly
disputed questions of fact or the cases involving tortious acts or
criminality like fraud or cheating could not have been decided
fact being in consonance with the evidence on
record does not deserve interference.
8. Though relying upon the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme ... complaints involving highly
disputed questions of fact or the cases involving tortious acts or
criminality like fraud or cheating could not have been decided
fact being in consonance with the evidence on
record does not deserve interference.
8. Though relying upon the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme ... complaints involving highly
disputed questions of fact or the cases involving tortious acts or
criminality like fraud or cheating could not have been decided
fact being in consonance with the evidence on
record does not deserve interference.
8. Though relying upon the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme ... complaints involving highly
disputed questions of fact or the cases involving tortious acts or
criminality like fraud or cheating could not have been decided
